In Senate Committee·Last action 155 days ago

Students and workers could get new AI and tech training grants

Officially: Workforce of the Future Act of 2025

The bill would fund more AI and technology education in schools and job training programs. It would also require federal reports on how AI is changing work and which workers are most at risk.

Where it stands

Sitting in Health

No vote scheduled. Constituent contact is what moves bills out of committee.

What this bill actually does

The Labor, Commerce, and Education Secretaries must write three reports on AI and jobs. An early report is due in 6 months, a final report in 1 year, and an update 3 years later.
The reports must show which jobs and industries AI is changing most. They must also list needed worker data, who owns it, and what skills people need to work with AI.
The reports must look at how AI affects different groups of workers. That includes race, ethnicity, gender, income, age, disability, and region, and the reports must recommend help for workers at higher risk.

↓ Why your message matters here

This bill is sitting in committee with no scheduled vote — which means a small number of constituent messages can decide whether it moves forward or quietly dies.

Where your representatives stand

Enter your ZIP to see how your senators and member of Congress have voted, sponsored, or spoken on this bill.

The debate

What people are saying about this bill

✓Arguments in support

Prepares workers for tech-driven jobs: Equips individuals with the necessary skills to meet the demands of the evolving job market, reducing unemployment from automation.
Addresses AI job displacement: Provides targeted training and resources for workers at risk of losing their jobs to AI, helping them transition to high-demand roles.
Boosts access for underserved groups: Improves education and training opportunities for underrepresented communities, potentially narrowing skill gaps in tech sectors.

✕Arguments against

High federal costs without proven ROI: The grant programs could strain budgets without clear evidence of their effectiveness in improving employment outcomes.
Risk of inefficient spending: Without strict oversight, funds might go to underperforming programs, as seen in past federal education initiatives.
Partisan nature limits bipartisanship: Sponsored solely by Democrats, the bill may face resistance in a divided Congress, delaying or blocking aid.

Where this bill is in the process

Legislative timeline

✓

Introduced

Introduced in Senate

—

●

Senate Committee

Under Senate committee consideration

Latest: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (12/3/2025)

DEC 3

○

Senate Floor Vote

Voted on by Senate

—

○

Passed Senate

Approved by Senate

—

○

House Review

Sent to House for consideration

—

○

Passed Both Chambers

Approved by both House and Senate

—

○

Signed into Law

Signed by the President

—

For more detail

Menu

Students and workers could get new AI and tech training grants

Where your representatives stand

What people are saying about this bill

Legislative timeline

Read deeper