This action needs another review before we explain what it means.
S. 3062 · GUARD Act
Accountability record
See what they have said and done—and where the information comes from.
Richard J. Durbin
IL · U.S. Senate
Require online platforms to protect kids by default
SupportsSupports stronger, enforceable responsibilities for online platforms to protect children and hold companies accountable for child-safety harms.
The cited statements do not establish a specific duty, liability rule, enforcement mechanism, or design prohibition.
Sources for this position
Limit addictive design without policing viewpoints
SupportsSupports regulating addictive, engagement-maximizing platform design that keeps children online for extended periods.
The cited statements do not identify which specific design features should be prohibited.
Strengthen kids’ privacy and limit data collection
SupportsSupports limiting large-scale collection, profiling, and targeted advertising involving children’s data.
The cited statements criticize these data practices but do not specify a particular privacy remedy.
Source for this position
Reject kids’ safety laws that could censor lawful information
Support depends onConditionally supports child-safety measures when they balance protection of children with protection of free speech.
They said: “We can and we will balance the need to protect free speech and the need to protect our kids from harm.”
This answer uses the specific statements and actions below. We consider what each bill or vote actually did; a bill number by itself is not treated as a position.
What they said
“Today's overwhelming vote should send a message to Big Tech that its days of policing itself are over.”
Read the full statement (opens in a new tab)“This has to change. The Senate Judiciary Committee is taking bipartisan action to see that it does.”
Read the full statement (opens in a new tab)We checked 32 of 32 bills Modern Action tracks on this subject.
Full record
Newest records with confirmed dates appear first.
This action needs another review before we explain what it means.
S. 3062 · GUARD Act
Durbin grassley pass bipartisan online child safety package through senate judiciary committee
“In the digital age, predators can target our kids from anywhere.”
This action needs another review before we explain what it means.
S. 1748 · Kids Online Safety Act
This action needs another review before we explain what it means.
S. 2012 · Runaway and Homeless Youth and Trafficking Prevention Act of 2025
This action needs another review before we explain what it means.
S. 1829 · STOP CSAM Act of 2025
Congressional hearing record
Congressional activity recorded in an official government source.
“Big Tech designs their platforms to be addictive, keeping users online for longer and longer so they can be fed more targeted ads”
Durbin statement on senate passage of kids online safety and privacy act
“Today's overwhelming vote should send a message to Big Tech that its days of policing itself are over.”
Durbin calls on senate colleagues to support efforts to protect childrens safety online
“This has to change. The Senate Judiciary Committee is taking bipartisan action to see that it does.”
Durbin joins in introduction of the bipartisan kids online safety act
“Our children are not commodities, and we can't continue to expect parents and victims alone to stand up to Big Tech with few ways to hold tech companies accountable.”
Durbin unveils new efforts to protect childrens online safety on the senate floor
“Congress must impose stronger, enforceable online protections for kids. Our children are not commodities, and we can't continue to expect parents and victims alone to stand up to Big Tech with few ways to hold tech companies accountable.”
Congressional hearing record
Congressional activity recorded in an official government source.
“online platforms are doing everything they can to keep our kids' eyes glued to their screens.”