ModernAction Logo
S.1829 · 119th Congress
Senate Floor·Last action 289 days ago

Bill adds stricter child-safety reporting rules and new lawsuits against platforms

Officially: STOP CSAM Act of 2025

Online services would have to send fuller child-exploitation reports and could face new fines or lawsuits if they fail. Victims would get stronger privacy protections in court and broader rights to restitution and civil damages.

Where it stands

floor_pending

Your representatives are deciding where they stand. A few messages can tip the balance.

What this bill actually does
  • More people would get privacy and courtroom protections in federal cases. That includes adults who were abused as children and child witnesses, not just children who are still minors.
  • Courts would start from the view that releasing a covered person's private information is harmful. That includes things like names, addresses, school records, and medical records, unless a judge finds disclosure is justified under tighter rules.
  • Sentencing would include a fuller picture of the harm to victims. Probation officers and guardians ad litem, who are court-appointed advocates for children, would have to gather and present that information in child abuse and exploitation cases.

↓ Why your message matters here

This bill is moving through Congress right now — your representative needs to hear from you.

Where do you stand?

Pick a stance and we'll draft a message to your representative in plain English.

The debate

What people are saying about this bill

Arguments in support
  • Strengthens Accountability: The bill holds tech companies accountable by requiring them to report on their efforts to combat CSAM, ensuring they take proactive measures.
  • Expands Legal Consequences: By creating new penalties for hosting CSAM, the bill aims to deter platforms from ignoring harmful content.
  • Supports Victims: Allocates funds for victim services and improves access to justice, providing essential support for survivors.
Arguments against
  • Threatens Encryption: Critics argue that the bill could undermine end-to-end encryption, making all users less secure.
  • Chills Free Speech: The potential for increased liability may lead platforms to over-censor content, affecting legitimate speech.
  • Vague Language: Terms like "promote" and "facilitate" are not clearly defined, leading to legal uncertainty.

Where this bill is in the process

Legislative timeline

Introduced

Introduced in Senate

Senate Committee

Under Senate committee consideration

Senate Floor Vote

Voted on by Senate

Latest: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 106. (6/26/2025)

JUN 26

Passed Senate

Approved by Senate

House Review

Sent to House for consideration

Passed Both Chambers

Approved by both House and Senate

Signed into Law

Signed by the President

For more detail

Read deeper