In Senate Committee·Last action 237 days ago

Bill targets fake election messages and voter intimidation

Officially: Deceptive Practices and Voter Intimidation Prevention Act of 2025

People could face fines, lawsuits, or jail time for knowingly spreading certain false voting information to stop others from voting in federal elections. The bill also lets the Justice Department send corrections and adds protections for election workers and officials.

Where it stands

Sitting in the Judiciary

No vote scheduled. Constituent contact is what moves bills out of committee.

What this bill actually does

People could not knowingly spread key lies about a federal election to stop others from voting. This covers false information about when, where, or how to vote, and who is allowed to vote, during the 60 days before the election.
People also could not use artificial intelligence, including generative AI, to make those false election messages. The ban applies when the goal is to keep people from voting.
People could not intentionally block or disrupt voting, voter registration, or help with voting in federal elections. That includes running a fake polling place or a fake ballot box that looks real.

↓ Why your message matters here

This bill is sitting in committee with no scheduled vote — which means a small number of constituent messages can decide whether it moves forward or quietly dies.

Where your representatives stand

Enter your ZIP to see how your senators and member of Congress have voted, sponsored, or spoken on this bill.

The debate

What people are saying about this bill

✓Arguments in support

Protects Democracy: Supporters argue that the bill combats the rise of deceptive practices that threaten the integrity of elections, particularly targeting marginalized communities.
Addresses Modern Threats: By focusing on AI-generated disinformation, the bill fills gaps in current laws that do not account for new technologies.
Increases Accountability: The requirement for post-election reports from the Attorney General ensures transparency and holds those spreading false information accountable.

✕Arguments against

Free Speech Concerns: Critics might argue that the bill could potentially infringe on free speech rights by penalizing certain types of communication.
Enforcement Challenges: There may be concerns about the practical challenges of enforcing the bill, especially in identifying and prosecuting offenders.
Overreach: Some might view the bill as an overreach of government power, particularly in its provisions allowing federal intervention in local election matters.

Where this bill is in the process

Legislative timeline

✓

Introduced

Introduced in Senate

—

●

Senate Committee

Under Senate committee consideration

Latest: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (9/18/2025)

SEP 18

○

Senate Floor Vote

Voted on by Senate

—

○

Passed Senate

Approved by Senate

—

○

House Review

Sent to House for consideration

—

○

Passed Both Chambers

Approved by both House and Senate

—

○

Signed into Law

Signed by the President

—

For more detail

Menu

Bill targets fake election messages and voter intimidation

Where your representatives stand

What people are saying about this bill

Legislative timeline

Read deeper