The EPA sets enforceable maximum contaminant levels for PFOA, PFOS, and potentially other PFAS chemicals in public drinking water, along with deadlines for water systems to comply. Current disputes include whether to keep limits for additional PFAS like GenX, how much time systems should have to install treatment, and whether small or struggling systems should qualify for exemptions.
Tell us where you stand
Answer the policy questions below. We'll map your positions to the bills in Congress and draft your message.
1 bill on this topic
“The federal government should set clear national limits for PFAS chemicals in public drinking water.”
Optional, but recommended. Messages sound more real when they include one specific reason from your life.
Example: My daughter's school closed twice last fall because of wildfire smoke.
Step 2 of 3 · Add your info next
Your message will cover 1 bill in Congress
A Yale field experiment found legislators shown actual district opinion shifted their votes to match it. The ones kept in the dark? No relationship between constituent views and how they voted.
Offices log, sort, tag, and tally incoming contact, then brief the member. Constituent communications eat roughly a third of House staff resources. Your message gets counted.
92% of staff say individualized messages influence undecided lawmakers — versus 56% for form letters. Naming a specific bill with your own reasoning puts you in a different category entirely.
When offices don’t hear from constituents, they ask lobbyists instead. Not contacting your rep doesn’t leave the scale empty — it hands the weight to someone else.
