Reform proposals would close a loophole where agencies buy commercially available information rather than obtain a warrant, restricting how government can acquire sensitive location, financial, and communications data.
Answer what matters
Skip any question. Your message only uses the topics and provisions you answer.
Related legislation
3 related bills are tracked for context, but none have a time-sensitive action window right now.
Track what happens
After sending, you can choose updates as votes, cosponsorships, and related bills move.
Official status
Enter your ZIP to see recorded votes, cosponsorships, and petition signatures tied to this subject.
Tell us where you stand
Answer the policy questions below or skip any that do not fit your view. We'll map only your answers to the bills in Congress and draft your message.
1 bill on this topic
“Congress should keep foreign intelligence surveillance powers only if they have strong privacy limits and clear end dates.”
2 bills on this topic
“Secret surveillance courts should hear independent views and share more legal information when it can be done without exposing real security risks.”
1 bill on this topic
“Companies should only be forced to help with secret surveillance under clear rules, court oversight, and notice to Congress.”
1 bill on this topic
“Foreign intelligence surveillance inside the United States should use clear legal paths, and emergency help from companies should have firm limits.”
1 bill on this topic
“Section 702 should stay in place only with tighter rules on when the government can look at Americans' data and how long it can keep it.”
Optional, but recommended. Your selections come from relevant bills in Congress; if something is missing or you want a specific point included, add it here.
Example: My daughter's school closed twice last fall because of wildfire smoke.
Step 2 of 3 · Add your info next
Your message will cover 3 bills in Congress
A Yale field experiment found legislators shown actual district opinion shifted their votes to match it. The ones kept in the dark? No relationship between constituent views and how they voted.
Offices log, sort, tag, and tally incoming contact, then brief the member. Constituent communications eat roughly a third of House staff resources. Your message gets counted.
92% of staff say individualized messages influence undecided lawmakers — versus 56% for form letters. Naming a specific bill with your own reasoning puts you in a different category entirely.
When offices don’t hear from constituents, they ask lobbyists instead. Not contacting your rep doesn’t leave the scale empty — it hands the weight to someone else.
These are related bills tracked for context. None have a time-sensitive action window on this subject right now.
