Whether new conservation, wilderness, or recreation designations should allow existing authorized grazing to continue, and under what limits.
Pick one or more. We'll use your choices and the connected bills to help you send a message to your elected officials.
Answer the policy questions below or skip any that don't fit your view. We use only your answers and the bills they connect to for your message.
1 bill on this topic
“Named Colorado public lands should receive wilderness or wilderness-like protections that limit new roads, motor vehicles, mechanized travel, and development, while handling specific areas such as Williams Fork Mountains, Sheep Mountain, Liberty Bell East, and Trail River Ranch differently.”
1 bill on this topic
“New protected areas should still allow specified existing activities and authorities, such as permitted races, some bike and helicopter use, state wildlife management, tribal treaty rights, existing water rights, military flights, firefighting, pest control, allowed grazing, and nearby activities outside the boundary.”
1 bill on this topic
“How much of our public land should be set aside as protected wilderness where development and motorized access are restricted?”
1 bill on this topic
“Authorized livestock grazing should be able to continue in Thompson Divide and Curecanti, while land managers can still apply limits allowed by law for safety, administration, and resource protection.”
1 bill on this topic
“Whether to create new national recreation areas managed by the National Park Service and how to balance recreation, conservation, grazing, and dam operations?”
One sentence is enough. Tell officials how this affects your family, work, bills, neighborhood, or values so the message sounds like you.
Example: My daughter's school closed twice last fall because of wildfire smoke.
Step 2 of 3 · Add your info next
Answer at least one question to continue
