Pick one or more. We'll use your choices and the connected bills to help you send a message to your elected officials.
Answer the policy questions below or skip any that don't fit your view. We use only your answers and the bills they connect to for your message.
1 bill on this topic
“The Attorney General should report to Congress for 10 years on how agencies follow the online censorship limits, and inspectors general should publish yearly numbers for seven years about related complaints, tips, investigations, and outcomes.”
1 bill on this topic
“When someone mostly wins and shows that federal enforcement was substantially driven by protected speech or political activity, the United States should be able to pay that person's attorney fees and court costs without ordinary fee caps?”
1 bill on this topic
“Federal executive officials should not use investigations, regulatory actions, civil cases, or criminal cases to punish people or organizations for constitutionally protected speech, association, expression, or political participation.”
1 bill on this topic
“Federal employees who violate limits on pressuring online services about lawful speech could face discipline, job bars, or fines, with higher possible fines for certain senior officials and enforcement by the Office of Special Counsel.”
1 bill on this topic
“Federal executive officials should not use investigations, prosecutions, regulation, enforcement, or similar official power against people in the United States or U.S.-based groups because of constitutionally protected speech, voting, campaigning, donations, religious exercise, or other political activity.”
1 bill on this topic
“Trump administration officials should be urged not to use federal regulations, licenses, investigations, or enforcement actions to punish or silence speech that criticizes President Trump or his policies.”
1 bill on this topic
“Federal employees should not use government authority, work settings, official tools, or other official influence to push online services to remove, hide, downrank, label, warn about, suspend, or limit access to lawful speech or accounts.”
1 bill on this topic
“Federal funds should not be spent on investigations, enforcement, regulatory actions, or similar federal actions that are substantially driven by protected political speech or activity, and people harmed by that spending should be able to sue to stop it.”
1 bill on this topic
“The government should not use its agencies or lawsuits to silence people who criticize political leaders.”
1 bill on this topic
“People and U.S.-based groups should be able to ask a federal court to stop a federal action that is happening now or about to happen when protected political speech or activity appears to be a substantial reason for the action.”
1 bill on this topic
“Federal employees and agencies should still be able to lawfully enforce federal laws online, including acting against speech that is not protected by the First Amendment.”
1 bill on this topic
“Federal employees should still be able to use official online accounts and press channels to share policy positions and public information, and agencies should still be able to set and enforce conditions on federal grants, loans, or other aid.”
1 bill on this topic
“Before many federal enforcement actions that ask an online service to remove, hide, label, or restrict unlawful speech or accounts, agency heads should report the planned action, legal basis, target, officials involved, and online service to oversight officials, with different timing or exemptions for serious crimes and classified national security information.”
1 bill on this topic
“People and U.S.-based groups should be able to seek money damages from individual federal officials who knowingly use federal power to punish protected political activity and violate constitutional rights, with reduced immunity and limited federal payment of those damages.”
1 bill on this topic
“People or groups facing federal civil enforcement cases or criminal prosecutions should be able to challenge the case after showing substantial evidence that protected political speech or activity helped motivate it, and courts should be able to examine the government's reasons and stop the case if the government fails the required proof test.”
1 bill on this topic
“The Senate should formally state that people have a First Amendment right to criticize public officials, including the President, and to take part in strong public debate without government retaliation.”
1 bill on this topic
“Federal immigration officials should not be able to deport a noncitizen under this specific rule for protected speech-related activity, while other deportation reasons, including safety and national security reasons, would still remain available.”
1 bill on this topic
“The Senate should formally say it is wrong for President Trump or his administration to suggest that people can be punished, censored, or intimidated by the federal government for criticizing him.”
One sentence is enough. Tell officials how this affects your family, work, bills, neighborhood, or values so the message sounds like you.
Example: My daughter's school closed twice last fall because of wildfire smoke.
Step 2 of 3 · Add your info next
Answer at least one question to continue
