Pick one or more. We'll use your choices and the connected bills to help you send a message to your elected officials.
Answer the policy questions below or skip any that don't fit your view. We use only your answers and the bills they connect to for your message.
1 bill on this topic
“Officials charged with new Section 702 crimes should be able to defend themselves by showing a disputed search or court statement was properly authorized, part of official job tasks, or made in good faith based on what they knew at the time.”
1 bill on this topic
“Prosecutors should not be able to use information against a U.S. person in a criminal case if officials obtained it by violating the new Section 702 protections for U.S. persons.”
1 bill on this topic
“The government should be able to keep using foreign intelligence surveillance powers when national security officials say they need them, but those powers should also respect privacy.”
1 bill on this topic
“The government should only keep using FISA Title VII surveillance powers if Congress is comfortable extending them and the rules around how they end.”
1 bill on this topic
“The national intelligence director and Attorney General should make public a specific March 17, 2026 FISA Court opinion about Section 702 surveillance by May 12, 2026, while blacking out parts when needed to protect intelligence sources and methods.”
1 bill on this topic
“The FISA Court should regularly review how agencies use Section 702, Congress should get access and reports for oversight, and GAO should audit whether targets are limited to non-U.S. persons outside the United States.”
1 bill on this topic
“Federal personnel should face criminal penalties for knowingly misusing certain classified U.S. person communications, running unauthorized Section 702 searches about U.S. persons, or knowingly misleading FISA courts about Section 702 search compliance.”
1 bill on this topic
“Intelligence agencies should be able to keep using FISA Title VII surveillance powers, including Section 702 collection aimed at non-U.S. persons abroad, until June 12, 2029 instead of June 12, 2026.”
1 bill on this topic
“Federal intelligence agencies should be able to keep using existing FISA Title VII surveillance powers until July 2, 2026, about three weeks after the current June 12, 2026 expiration date, without changing how those powers work.”
1 bill on this topic
“FISA Title VII foreign-intelligence surveillance powers should stay in effect for one more week, and the related wiretap-law date should move too, so both end on June 19, 2026.”
1 bill on this topic
“Agencies should face stricter limits before targeting U.S. persons, searching Section 702 data for U.S. person identifiers, or adding raw Section 702 information about U.S. persons to FBI analysis systems.”
One sentence is enough. Tell officials how this affects your family, work, bills, neighborhood, or values so the message sounds like you.
Example: My daughter's school closed twice last fall because of wildfire smoke.
Step 2 of 3 · Add your info next
Answer at least one question to continue
