Legislation aimed at prohibiting the distribution of materially deceptive AI-generated audio or visual media involving federal candidates, with remedies for affected candidates.
Answer what matters
Skip any question. Your message only uses the topics and provisions you answer.
Related legislation
3 related bills are tracked for context, but none have a time-sensitive action window right now.
Track what happens
After sending, you can choose updates as votes, cosponsorships, and related bills move.
Official status
Enter your ZIP to see recorded votes, cosponsorships, and petition signatures tied to this subject.
Tell us where you stand
Answer the policy questions below or skip any that do not fit your view. We'll map only your answers to the bills in Congress and draft your message.
1 bill on this topic
“Federal election rules should limit realistic AI fakes that could mislead voters about candidates while still protecting lawful political speech.”
1 bill on this topic
“Should federal law limit the spread of AI-made fake videos or audio about federal candidates during campaigns?”
1 bill on this topic
“Candidates should be able to use civil courts to stop and recover from realistic AI fakes that harm their campaigns.”
1 bill on this topic
“Rules about digital content records should be enforceable by public agencies and, in some cases, by harmed content owners in court.”
1 bill on this topic
“Digital content tools should help people know where online images, videos, audio, and text came from and whether they were made or changed by artificial intelligence.”
Optional, but recommended. Your selections come from relevant bills in Congress; if something is missing or you want a specific point included, add it here.
Example: My daughter's school closed twice last fall because of wildfire smoke.
Step 2 of 3 · Add your info next
Your message will cover 3 bills in Congress
A Yale field experiment found legislators shown actual district opinion shifted their votes to match it. The ones kept in the dark? No relationship between constituent views and how they voted.
Offices log, sort, tag, and tally incoming contact, then brief the member. Constituent communications eat roughly a third of House staff resources. Your message gets counted.
92% of staff say individualized messages influence undecided lawmakers — versus 56% for form letters. Naming a specific bill with your own reasoning puts you in a different category entirely.
When offices don’t hear from constituents, they ask lobbyists instead. Not contacting your rep doesn’t leave the scale empty — it hands the weight to someone else.
These are related bills tracked for context. None have a time-sensitive action window on this subject right now.
