Policies requiring clear and conspicuous disclosure of AI-generated content in political advertisements to ensure voters are informed about the nature of the content they are viewing.
Tell us where you stand
Answer the policy questions below. We'll map your positions to the bills in Congress and draft your message.
1 bill on this topic
“Federal election rules should limit realistic AI fakes that could mislead voters about candidates while still protecting lawful political speech.”
1 bill on this topic
“Should federal law limit the spread of AI-made fake videos or audio about federal candidates during campaigns?”
1 bill on this topic
“Candidates should be able to use civil courts to stop and recover from realistic AI fakes that harm their campaigns.”
Optional, but recommended. Messages sound more real when they include one specific reason from your life.
Example: My daughter's school closed twice last fall because of wildfire smoke.
Step 2 of 3 · Add your info next
Your message will cover 2 bills in Congress
A Yale field experiment found legislators shown actual district opinion shifted their votes to match it. The ones kept in the dark? No relationship between constituent views and how they voted.
Offices log, sort, tag, and tally incoming contact, then brief the member. Constituent communications eat roughly a third of House staff resources. Your message gets counted.
92% of staff say individualized messages influence undecided lawmakers — versus 56% for form letters. Naming a specific bill with your own reasoning puts you in a different category entirely.
When offices don’t hear from constituents, they ask lobbyists instead. Not contacting your rep doesn’t leave the scale empty — it hands the weight to someone else.
