Accountability record
Where Richard J. Durbin stands on Gulf of Mexico Dead Zone and Marine Life
Statements, legislative actions, and public records—shown with the sources behind them.
Richard J. Durbin
IL · U.S. Senate
Where they stand
In August 2024, Richard J. Durbin supported allocating a larger share of nationwide USDA conservation funding to Illinois and expanding participation in voluntary farm conservation programs to reduce runoff associated with the Gulf dead zone.
Position details
Pay farmers to voluntarily reduce Gulf dead-zone pollution
SupportsIn August 2024, Richard J. Durbin supported expanding voluntary farmer conservation incentives, including programs for cover crops, conservation tillage, and improved fertilizer practices.
This dated position does not establish support for enforceable nutrient limits or other policy approaches beyond voluntary conservation incentives.
Source for this position
Expand efforts to shrink the Gulf dead zone
SupportsIn August 2024, Richard J. Durbin supported allocating a substantially larger share of nationwide USDA conservation funding to Illinois and expanding conservation participation to reduce runoff connected to the Gulf dead zone.
The evidence concerns Illinois’s share of nationwide conservation funding, not an increase in the nationwide funding total. This dated position does not by itself establish a current position or a broader stance on other Gulf dead-zone policies.
Source for this position
How we reached this answer
This answer uses the specific statements and actions below. We consider what each bill or vote actually did; a bill number by itself is not treated as a position.
What they said
“We request that USDA double, even triple, the percentage of nationwide conservation funding allocated to Illinois.”
Read the full statement (opens in a new tab)“We also urge USDA to revise its program rules to better recognize the conditions specific to Illinois agriculture so that participation in these critical farm conservation programs can be rapidly expanded in our state.”
Read the full statement (opens in a new tab)
Full record
Explore the evidence
Open the timeline for dated statements, speeches, votes, sponsorships, petition signatures, and source links.
Evidence timeline3 timeline entries3 statement sources6 verified passagesOpenClose
Newest records with confirmed dates appear first.
- What they’ve said· Official statement
Official statement about a letter
“We request that USDA double, even triple, the percentage of nationwide conservation funding allocated to Illinois.”
“We also urge USDA to revise its program rules to better recognize the conditions specific to Illinois agriculture so that participation in these critical farm conservation programs can be rapidly expanded in our state.”
- What they’ve said· Official statement
Official statement about a letter
“In addition, EPA must work with state authorities to set more restrictive standards for processing plants that discharge into sensitive waterways, like the Illinois River, by setting total maximum daily load limits and better enforcing standards by requiring penalties and reclamation when violations occur.”
“EPA should revise its outdated 2004 discharge standards to set more stringent water pollution limits”
“I urge EPA to use its full authority to protect public and environmental health by requiring meat-processing plantings, including the JBS plant in Beardstown, Illinois, to use every available method to reduce the pollution they emit in the rivers, lakes, and streams we use for recreation and drinking water.”
Context only — this record does not establish the official’s broader position or motive.
- What they’ve said· Press release
Durbin statement on jbs pork processing plant pollution in beardstown
“Tougher national standards on water pollution from meat-processing are long overdue and are necessary to protect the health of our waterways.”
Context only — this record does not establish the official’s broader position or motive.
Search coverage
See where this review searched and which records it actually verified. Statements and actions can support the answer above; money appears only as separate context.
Legislative record
Not searched in this review
Bills currently linked to this issue
Official statements
Searched · 2 records
Official statements reviewed
Verified social posts
Complete for this scope through Aug 19, 2026
Verified official X account
Congressional Record
Searched
Congressional passages reviewed
Hearings
Searched
Committee and hearing passages reviewed
News and interviews
Searched
Reporting and interviews reviewed
Letters
Some records available · 4 records
Signed letters found
Public statements, verified social and news · search completed · 6 verified
Votes, bills and petitions · search completed
Other public records · no public record found
