Accountability record

Where Nick LaLota stands on Mail-In Voting

Statements, legislative actions, and public records—shown with the sources behind them.

Nick LaLota

NY-1 · U.S. House

Where they stand

In February 2026, Nick LaLota supported addressing delayed or unreliable postmarking that could affect mail-ballot acceptance.

Position details

How we reached this answer

What they said

We checked 42 of 42 bills Modern Action tracks on this subject.

Full record

Explore the evidence

Open the timeline for dated statements, speeches, votes, sponsorships, petition signatures, and source links.

Evidence timeline8 timeline entries4 statement sources5 verified passages4 congressional actionsOpen

Records with confirmed dates appear newest first. Records without a confirmed date follow.

  1. What they’ve said· Official statement

    Official statement about a letter

    “For our constituents, a delayed postmark could result in late fees on bills, essential utilities being shut off, mail-in ballots not being accepted by local Boards of Elections”
  2. Procedural vote

    Voted NO in a procedural vote.

    H.R. 22 · Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act

    This shows how the official voted on this decision. It does not show why they voted that way or prove their position on every part of the bill.

  3. What they’ve said· Press release

    Lalota backs save act strengthen election integrity and prevent voter fraud

    “I remain committed to making it easier to vote and harder to cheat.”

    Context only — this record does not establish the official’s broader position or motive.

  4. Cosponsor

    Joined the bill as a cosponsor.

    H.R. 22 · Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act

  5. What they’ve said· Official statement

    Voter id

    “The future of American elections, in every state, should include Voter ID”
    “Voter ID would significantly reduce voter fraud by impersonation, which is particularly easy to commit in New York.”

    Context only — this record does not establish the official’s broader position or motive.

  6. What they’ve saidDate unavailable· Official statement

    Official statement about a letter

    “we ask that the RTO plan be reversed until the Postal Service can assure customers across the country that they will not experience delayed postmarking”
Search coverage

See where this review searched and which records it actually verified. Statements and actions can support the answer above; money appears only as separate context.

  • Legislative record

    Complete for this scope · 4 records

    Bills currently linked to this issue

  • Official statements

    Searched · 3 records

    Official statements reviewed

  • Verified social posts

    Complete for this scope through Oct 10, 2026

    Verified official X account

  • Congressional Record

    Searched

    Congressional passages reviewed

  • Hearings

    Searched

    Committee and hearing passages reviewed

  • News and interviews

    Searched

    Reporting and interviews reviewed

  • Letters

    Searched · 2 records

    Signed letters found

  • Public statements, verified social and news · search completed · 5 verified

  • Votes, bills and petitions · search completed · 13 verified

  • Other public records · no public record found

Updated Oct 10, 2026