In Senate Committee·Last action 316 days ago

Large companies would have to test and report high-risk AI tools

Officially: Algorithmic Accountability Act of 2025

Large companies would have to check AI tools used in major life decisions. They would report key details to the FTC before using new systems and at least once a year after that. The FTC would publish public information and enforce the rules.

Where it stands

Sitting in Commerce

No vote scheduled. Constituent contact is what moves bills out of committee.

What this bill actually does

The bill mainly covers large companies that fall under FTC authority. A company can be covered if it meets certain revenue or value levels, or if it handles identifying data on more than 1,000,000 consumers, households, or devices for automated decision systems.
The bill covers automated systems used for major life decisions. These include decisions about access, price, terms, or availability for education, jobs, utilities, family planning, financial services, health care, housing, and legal services.
Covered companies would have to check these systems before and after using them. They would also have to update those impact assessments over time.

↓ Why your message matters here

This bill is sitting in committee with no scheduled vote — which means a small number of constituent messages can decide whether it moves forward or quietly dies.

Where your representatives stand

Enter your ZIP to see how your senators and member of Congress have voted, sponsored, or spoken on this bill.

The debate

What people are saying about this bill

✓Arguments in support

Supporters believe the bill will increase transparency and accountability in AI systems, ensuring fairer outcomes for consumers.
It addresses concerns about AI bias, particularly in critical areas like employment and lending, which can disproportionately affect marginalized groups.
The bill encourages responsible AI use by requiring companies to assess and mitigate negative impacts on consumers.

✕Arguments against

Critics may argue that the bill imposes regulatory burdens on businesses, potentially stifling innovation in AI technology.
There are concerns about the costs of compliance, especially for smaller companies that may not have the resources to conduct detailed impact assessments.
Some may feel that the bill lacks clear enforcement mechanisms, which could limit its effectiveness.

Where this bill is in the process

Legislative timeline

✓

Introduced

Introduced in Senate

—

●

Senate Committee

Under Senate committee consideration

Latest: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. (6/25/2025)

JUN 25

○

Senate Floor Vote

Voted on by Senate

—

○

Passed Senate

Approved by Senate

—

○

House Review

Sent to House for consideration

—

○

Passed Both Chambers

Approved by both House and Senate

—

○

Signed into Law

Signed by the President

—

For more detail

Menu

Large companies would have to test and report high-risk AI tools

Where your representatives stand

What people are saying about this bill

Legislative timeline

Read deeper