Bill brief/S.1883/119th Congress
U.S. agencies would have to build a joint plan for 4 adversary nations
Official title
DISRUPT Act
S.1883, the DISRUPT Act, tells the U.S. government to create a coordinated plan to deal with growing cooperation among China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea. It sets up task forces, requires classified reports, and outlines a strategy to use diplomacy, economic tools, and defense planning. The bill has been reported out of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee with an amendment.
Bill
S.1883
Introduced
May 22, 2025
Sponsor
Christopher Coons
Chamber
Senate
What the bill does
What this bill does
The DISRUPT Act focuses on how four countries—China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea—are working together in military, economic, and political ways. It states that this cooperation can make it harder for the United States to use tools like sanctions and can increase the risk of facing more than one of these countries in a conflict at the same time. The bill makes it official U. S. policy to try to disrupt the most dangerous parts of this cooperation. This includes using sanctions and export controls, exposing this activity publicly, and sharing information with U. S.
allies and partners who may be able to influence these countries. It also says the United States should work to limit how far this group can spread its power and be ready for possible challenges or conflicts with more than one of them at once. To put this policy into practice, the bill requires several major agencies—the Departments of State, Defense, Treasury, and Commerce, plus the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and the Central Intelligence Agency—to each create a “task force on adversary alignment” within 60 days of the law taking effect.
Each task force must include experts on all four countries, staff from key parts of the agency, and people with the right security clearances. Within 180 days, each task force must send a report to its agency head and key committees in Congress explaining how this cooperation affects its work and recommending any changes the agency needs to respond better. The bill also orders the Director of National Intelligence to provide a classified report within 60 days on how these four countries are cooperating now, how that cooperation is likely to grow over the next five years, and what risks this creates for U. S.
and allied diplomacy, intelligence, military, and economic activities. This report must also look at weaknesses or tensions inside these relationships and how efforts to separate the countries might work. Within 180 days, the Secretaries of State and Defense, working with Treasury, Commerce, the Director of National Intelligence, and the CIA Director, must send Congress a classified report describing a two-year strategic approach.
This strategy must explain tools to disrupt dangerous cooperation (especially links between the countries’ defense industries), a timeline for working with allies and partners, a plan to keep U. S. economic tools like sanctions and export controls effective, and a plan to strengthen deterrence in the Indo-Pacific, Europe, and the Middle East. It also must cover improving U. S. war-planning software and processes, and assessing and addressing gaps in U. S. capabilities if it had to deal with more than one of these countries at the same time.
The bill defines which congressional committees in the Senate and House will receive these classified reports, focusing on armed services, intelligence, foreign affairs, appropriations, financial, and commerce-related committees.
Key provisions
- Makes it official U.S. policy to break up the most dangerous cooperation among China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea. It points to tools like sanctions, export controls, exposing activity, and sharing information with allies.
- Tells the U.S. government to get ready for the chance of facing pressure or conflict from more than one of these countries at once. That planning must cover more than one region.
- Requires six major agencies to create a task force on this issue within 60 days after the bill becomes law. Those agencies are State, Defense, Treasury, Commerce, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, and the CIA.
- Each task force must send a report within 180 days to its agency head and the listed congressional committees. The report must explain how this cooperation affects the agency's work and what internal changes may be needed.
- Requires the heads of these task forces to meet every three months across agencies. The goal is to line up findings and decide next steps.
- Orders the Director of National Intelligence to deliver a classified report within 60 days. It must cover current and likely future cooperation among the four countries and the risks to U.S. and allied activity.
- Requires a separate classified two-year strategy within 180 days from the Secretaries of State and Defense, working with other agencies. It must cover disruption tools, work with allies, economic pressure, and deterrence plans.
- Calls for plans to build up U.S. and allied ammunition stockpiles and weapons production. It also calls for joint production, maintenance with allies, and better use of Foreign Military Financing to help partners build defense capacity.
- Tells the Defense Department to digitize and update its war-planning tools within one year after the strategy report. The update must better reflect fast-changing information about cooperation among these countries.
- Gives oversight to specific Senate and House committees. Those committees cover armed services, intelligence, foreign affairs, appropriations, banking and financial services, and commerce, and they would receive the classified reports.
Impact
Why it matters—and who it affects
Why it matters
The bill centers on how four major countries that the United States labels as adversaries may gain advantages by working together—sharing weapons, technology, money flows, and diplomatic support. This cooperation can affect how quickly they improve their military forces, how they respond to U.S. and allied actions, and how they operate in regions like Europe, the Middle East, and the Indo-Pacific. For the U.S. government, the bill pushes agencies to stop looking at each country in isolation and instead plan for linked or simultaneous challenges. That means new internal task forces, updated intelligence assessments, and adjusted military and economic planning. The public effects are indirect: the bill does not create new public programs, but it may influence future decisions on sanctions, trade rules, military aid, and defense spending. Some outcomes are uncertain because the bill mainly orders planning and reporting rather than specific actions like new sanctions or troop movements. How much it changes day-to-day policy will depend on what the classified reports recommend and how the executive branch and Congress choose to act on those recommendations later.
Who it affects
This bill mainly affects national security agencies, Congress, and U.S. allies that depend on American defense planning and military support. It could also matter for countries like Israel, Taiwan, and Ukraine because the required strategy must address support for them inside broader regional plans. The public would feel the effects more indirectly through later policy choices on sanctions, trade controls, defense spending, and security aid.
The debate
The case for it—and the concerns
These are the main arguments surrounding the bill, not Modern Action’s position.
Arguments in support
- Coordinating a whole-of-government strategy may help U.S. agencies avoid working at cross purposes when dealing with linked actions by China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea.
- Formal task forces and required reports could improve information-sharing and ensure senior leaders and Congress have up-to-date assessments of how these countries are cooperating.
- Focusing on defense industrial links and munitions stockpiles may help the United States and its allies be better prepared if multiple crises occur at the same time.
- Reviewing sanctions and export control enforcement may strengthen economic tools that are already central to U.S. foreign policy.
- Involving allies and partners explicitly in the strategy may support more coordinated international responses rather than isolated U.S. actions.
Concerns and tradeoffs
- The bill increases classified planning and bureaucratic structures without directly setting limits, safeguards, or measurable goals, so its effectiveness may be hard to judge from the outside.
- Framing the four countries together could make diplomacy with any one of them more complex or reduce flexibility for separate negotiations.
- Expanding focus on simultaneous conflicts and higher munitions levels may be seen as encouraging more military-oriented planning rather than emphasizing de-escalation or conflict prevention.
- Additional reporting and task-force requirements could add workload and costs for agencies without new funding or may duplicate existing interagency processes.
- Because the main reports are classified, the public and many lawmakers may have limited ability to review or debate the strategy that results from this bill.
- The bill does not itself create new sanctions, export controls, or military deployments; it mainly directs analysis, planning, and coordination that could later support such actions.
- Many of the most detailed requirements, including risk assessments and strategic plans, are required to be classified, so their contents will not be publicly accessible.
- The strategy must address support for specific partners—Israel, Taiwan, and Ukraine—within broader regional deterrence plans, which ties this bill to existing and future debates over U.S. security assistance.
Check the details
Key facts
- Declares it U.S. policy to disrupt the “most dangerous aspects” of cooperation among China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea using tools such as sanctions, export controls, exposure of activities, and information-sharing with allies.
- Directs the U.S. government to prepare for the possibility of simultaneous challenges or conflicts with more than one of these countries in multiple regions.
- Requires six major entities (State, Defense, Treasury, Commerce, the Director of National Intelligence, and the CIA) to each set up a “task force on adversary alignment” within 60 days of enactment.
- Each task force must submit, within 180 days, a report to its agency head and to specified congressional committees on how adversary cooperation affects its operations and what organizational changes may be needed.
- Mandates quarterly interagency meetings among the heads of these task forces to coordinate findings and next steps.
- Orders the Director of National Intelligence to provide, within 60 days, a classified assessment of current and projected cooperation among the four countries and the resulting risks for U.S. and allied activities.
- Requires a separate classified two-year strategic-approach report, within 180 days, from the Secretaries of State and Defense (in consultation with other agencies) covering disruption tools, alliance efforts, economic statecraft, and deterrence plans.
- Specifically calls for plans to increase U.S. and allied munitions stockpiles, support co-production and maintenance of key military items with allies, and make more effective use of Foreign Military Financing to boost partner defense production.
Legislative record
How far the bill has moved
Awaiting Senate floor consideration
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 99. · Jun 18, 2025
- Introduced
- Senate Committee
- 3Senate Floor Vote
- 4Passed Senate
- 5House Review
- 6Passed Both Chambers
- 7Signed into Law
Contact Congress
Send a message about this bill
Choose your position, add what matters to you, and send a message to the officials who can act on this bill.
Contact your senators