In House Committee·Last action 147 days ago

Bill would end the 2001 post-9/11 war authority after 240 days

Officially: Sunset for the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force Act

The bill would cancel the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force, the law used for many post-9/11 military actions. That repeal would start 240 days after enactment. It does not replace that authority with a new one.

Where it stands

Sitting in House Committee

No vote scheduled. Constituent contact is what moves bills out of committee.

What this bill actually does

This bill cancels the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force, the post-9/11 war law listed as Public Law 107-40.
The old law would not end right away. It would stay in place until 240 days after this bill becomes law.
The bill says Congress believes the 2001 AUMF has turned into a broad, open-ended permission to use military force.

↓ Why your message matters here

This bill is sitting in committee with no scheduled vote — which means a small number of constituent messages can decide whether it moves forward or quietly dies.

Where your representatives stand

Enter your ZIP to see how your senators and member of Congress have voted, sponsored, or spoken on this bill.

The debate

What people are saying about this bill

✓Arguments in support

Reclaims Congressional Authority: Supporters argue that repealing the AUMF would restore Congress's constitutional role in authorizing military force, ensuring more democratic oversight.
Prevents Mission Creep: The bill would stop the expansion of military actions to conflicts unrelated to the original 9/11 attacks, focusing efforts on current threats.
Ends Indefinite Detentions: Repeal could lead to clearer legal rules for detaining individuals associated with terrorism, moving away from indefinite detentions without trial.

✕Arguments against

Removes Authority for Active Operations: Critics argue that repealing the AUMF would eliminate the legal basis for ongoing military operations against groups like ISIS, potentially leaving the U.S. vulnerable.
Creates Operational Gaps: Without the AUMF, there could be delays or legal challenges in responding to threats, as new authorizations would be needed.
No Ready Replacement: The lack of a new framework could embolden terrorist groups, as Congress has not yet passed alternative authorizations.

Where this bill is in the process

Legislative timeline

✓

Introduced

Introduced in House

—

●

House Committee

Under House committee consideration

Latest: Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs. (12/16/2025)

DEC 16

○

House Floor Vote

Voted on by House

—

○

Passed House

Approved by House

—

○

Senate Review

Sent to Senate for consideration

—

○

Passed Both Chambers

Approved by both House and Senate

—

○

Signed into Law

Signed by the President

—

For more detail

Menu

Bill would end the 2001 post-9/11 war authority after 240 days

Where your representatives stand

What people are saying about this bill

Legislative timeline

Read deeper