Pick one or more. We'll use your choices and the connected bills to help you send a message to your elected officials.
Answer the policy questions below or skip any that don't fit your view. We use only your answers and the bills they connect to for your message.
1 bill on this topic
“FBI personnel should be trained before using Section 702 search tools, write reasons for U.S. person searches, get added approvals for batch or sensitive searches, keep records, use controls to prevent accidental searches, and face consequences for violations.”
1 bill on this topic
“The FBI should need approval, written reasons, and extra review before searching Section 702 data for U.S. persons, lawmakers, political groups, news or religious organizations, large batches, or ordinary crime evidence.”
1 bill on this topic
“The government should face tighter limits before using Section 702 information about Americans in court or agency cases, and people should get clearer notice when evidence used against them comes from FISA surveillance.”
1 bill on this topic
“Information found through Section 702 should be harder to use in court or agency proceedings when it came from emergency searches or involves U.S. persons, especially outside serious threat cases.”
1 bill on this topic
“Agencies should have to delete many Section 702 and EO 12333 intelligence records about Americans after set time limits, unless the information is needed for a court case, a specified national-security threat, or another authorized reason.”
1 bill on this topic
“Agencies should not search Section 702 data only to find crime evidence unless the search is for an emergency threat, court-case disclosure job tasks, or valid consent.”
1 bill on this topic
“The government should need stronger checks before it searches foreign intelligence data for information about people in the United States.”
1 bill on this topic
“FBI searches tied to elected officials, candidates, political groups, news media, religious groups, or Members of Congress should get higher approval, legal review, or notice to congressional leaders.”
1 bill on this topic
“Congress should formally state that Section 702 cannot be used to directly target U.S. persons and that foreign-intelligence targeting of a U.S. person requires a specific court order based on probable cause.”
1 bill on this topic
“Agencies should face stronger limits before searching Section 702 data for information about U.S. persons or people in the United States, including limits on who may search, when a warrant is needed, when narrow exceptions apply, and what records must be kept.”
1 bill on this topic
“Officials should usually need a warrant or FISA court order before targeting Americans or people in the United States for foreign-intelligence surveillance, or before searching Section 702 or EO 12333 databases for their messages or information.”
Personalized messages move reps far more than form messages. Add why you care, what's on your mind, or anything personal Modern Action should work into your message.
Example: My daughter's school closed twice last fall because of wildfire smoke.
Step 2 of 3 · Add your info next
Answer at least one question to continue
