Pick one or more. We'll use your choices and the connected bills to help you send a message to your elected officials.
Answer the policy questions below or skip any that don't fit your view. We use only your answers and the bills they connect to for your message.
1 bill on this topic
“Each new Apex land transfer, land-interest transfer, or right-of-way should go through the applicable federal land-law checks, including environmental review under NEPA and public-land management review under FLPMA.”
1 bill on this topic
“Congress should cancel the Bureau of Land Management's 2024 plan amendment for federal lands overseen by the Buffalo Field Office, which set how those lands could be used, protected, or developed.”
1 bill on this topic
“Congress should cancel BLM's January 14, 2025 North Dakota Field Office land plan, so BLM could no longer use that plan to manage the affected federal public lands.”
1 bill on this topic
“Congress should reject the named National Park Service rule about motor vehicles at Glen Canyon National Recreation Area, making that specific rule legally void and unenforceable.”
1 bill on this topic
“If Congress cancels BLM's Central Yukon land plan, BLM should generally be blocked from issuing a substantially similar Central Yukon plan unless Congress later allows it.”
1 bill on this topic
“After Congress cancels a federal oil and gas leasing decision, the agency should generally be blocked from issuing a substantially similar leasing decision later unless Congress gives new authorization.”
1 bill on this topic
“Congress should be able to use the Congressional Review Act to overturn BLM land-use decisions, which would erase the decision and can block BLM from issuing a substantially similar one later unless Congress allows it.”
1 bill on this topic
“After Congress rejects the Glen Canyon motor vehicle rule, the National Park Service should not be able to issue the same rule again or create a substantially similar replacement unless Congress later allows it.”
1 bill on this topic
“Some wildfire, forest health, hazard tree, and fireshed projects should move faster through planning, environmental review, and lawsuits, including larger projects that can skip full review and limits on restarting some endangered species reviews for older land-use plans.”
1 bill on this topic
“Federal officials should be able to name high-risk wildfire areas and study their wildfire risks without doing NEPA environmental review for those planning steps.”
1 bill on this topic
“People challenging some fireshed or forest projects should face shorter filing deadlines and narrower court options, including limits on when courts can stop work after finding legal problems.”
Personalized messages move reps far more than form messages. Add why you care, what's on your mind, or anything personal Modern Action should work into your message.
Example: My daughter's school closed twice last fall because of wildfire smoke.
Step 2 of 3 · Add your info next
Answer at least one question to continue
