Bills about whether Congress should set national rules for extreme price increases during emergencies or supply disruptions.
Answer what matters
Skip any question. Your message only uses the topics and provisions you answer.
Related legislation
2 related bills are tracked for context, but none have a time-sensitive action window right now.
Track what happens
After sending, you can choose updates as votes, cosponsorships, and related bills move.
Tell us where you stand
Answer the policy questions below or skip any that do not fit your view. We'll map only your answers to the bills in Congress and draft your message.
2 bills on this topic
“The federal government should be able to stop businesses from charging prices that are far too high, and the rules should be clear enough that people and businesses know where the line is.”
1 bill on this topic
“Large or powerful companies should face stricter rules on price hikes during disasters, health emergencies, and other major market disruptions.”
1 bill on this topic
“The Federal Trade Commission should have the tools and funding to enforce a national rule against extreme price gouging.”
1 bill on this topic
“If the government bans unfair price spikes, it should have clear power and enough resources to enforce that rule without creating unfair or overlapping punishment.”
1 bill on this topic
“Public companies should tell investors more about how prices, costs, and profits changed during major market shocks.”
1 bill on this topic
“States should be able to help enforce price-gouging rules, but the law should also be clear about how state and federal cases fit together.”
Optional, but recommended. Messages sound more real when they include one specific reason from your life.
Example: My daughter's school closed twice last fall because of wildfire smoke.
Step 2 of 3 · Add your info next
Your message will cover 2 bills in Congress
A Yale field experiment found legislators shown actual district opinion shifted their votes to match it. The ones kept in the dark? No relationship between constituent views and how they voted.
Offices log, sort, tag, and tally incoming contact, then brief the member. Constituent communications eat roughly a third of House staff resources. Your message gets counted.
92% of staff say individualized messages influence undecided lawmakers — versus 56% for form letters. Naming a specific bill with your own reasoning puts you in a different category entirely.
When offices don’t hear from constituents, they ask lobbyists instead. Not contacting your rep doesn’t leave the scale empty — it hands the weight to someone else.
These are related bills tracked for context. None have a time-sensitive action window on this subject right now.
