
Pick one or more. We'll use your choices and the connected bills to help you send a message to your elected officials.
Answer the policy questions below or skip any that don't fit your view. We use only your answers and the bills they connect to for your message.
1 bill on this topic
“When the government gets or shares covered data in violation of access limits, agencies should have to limit keeping and sharing it, and courts or other official bodies should not be able to use it as evidence?”
1 bill on this topic
“Government agencies should need comparable court process before forcing data brokers or other third parties to hand over protected digital records, and judges should use the strongest privacy standard that applies to the request.”
1 bill on this topic
“Government privacy limits should cover account records, message contents, location data, data that can still identify someone after names are removed, and data gathered through deception, unauthorized access, broken privacy promises, or violated data contracts.”
1 bill on this topic
“The government should not get around privacy rules by asking a different company or middle-layer service for the same online records.”
1 bill on this topic
“Federal law enforcement agencies should usually be barred from paying data brokers or other private companies for personal data about people in the United States, with listed exceptions and extra limits for location and biometric data.”
1 bill on this topic
“Federal agencies should not use state or local agencies to get data that federal privacy standards would block if the federal government got it directly, and some state and local agencies should publicly report when they obtain that kind of data.”
1 bill on this topic
“Intelligence and law enforcement agencies should usually need court approval, consent, an emergency, or another listed reason before buying, searching, or demanding covered personal data from data brokers or similar companies.”
1 bill on this topic
“Government agencies should not be able to buy sensitive personal data when they would need legal approval to get the same information directly.”
1 bill on this topic
“The government should not buy or force access to sensitive personal data as a way around the privacy rules that would apply to phone, email, or location records.”
1 bill on this topic
“Government data limits should apply when agencies pay for access through purchases, subscriptions, service fees, license fees, or similar deals, and when the data came from deception, unauthorized access, broken privacy promises, or resale through other companies.”
1 bill on this topic
“Police and intelligence agencies should not be able to buy protected digital records or wrongly obtained personal data from data brokers or other third parties, and other agencies should not be able to buy it for them.”
1 bill on this topic
“When officials obtain surveillance or digital data without meeting the required legal standard, they should usually be blocked from using it in cases, sharing it further, or keeping it, including rejected emergency surveillance, banned personal-data purchases, improper Section 702 use, and unlawfully gathered personal vehicle data?”
1 bill on this topic
“Companies that help deliver, store, or process online communications for internet or cloud providers should have to protect stored message content and related customer or communication records instead of sharing them without valid legal authority.”
1 bill on this topic
“Police and intelligence agencies should not be able to pay data brokers or other third parties for covered private digital data, or get that data through another government office that bought it for them.”
1 bill on this topic
“Federal officers should usually need a warrant, clear consent, or a defined emergency before accessing digital data from personal vehicle systems, and personal vehicle data gathered unlawfully should not be used as evidence.”
1 bill on this topic
“Internet and cloud infrastructure companies that transmit, store, or process communications should not knowingly share stored message contents or give government agencies user, sender, or recipient records unless an allowed legal process or exception applies.”
1 bill on this topic
“Digital privacy protections should cover account records, subscriber records, communication content, and location data tied to people in the United States and some U.S. persons abroad, while leaving out public information, certain background-check data, and license plate reader data.”
1 bill on this topic
“Federal agencies should usually need a warrant or FISA order to intentionally target protected people for private digital data, collect sensitive metadata about them, or obtain company-held location history, browsing records, search queries, cloud files, emails, app records, and similar digital service data.”
1 bill on this topic
“Middleman or support-service providers should not voluntarily give the government communication contents or related records unless an allowed Stored Communications Act process applies.”
1 bill on this topic
“The government should need a warrant before getting most private digital records and car data about people in the United States.”
One sentence is enough. Tell officials how this affects your family, work, bills, neighborhood, or values so the message sounds like you.
Example: My daughter's school closed twice last fall because of wildfire smoke.
Step 2 of 3 · Add your info next
Answer at least one question to continue