Whether low-value imported packages should keep duty-free treatment, lose it broadly, or lose it only for higher-risk shipments and products.
Pick one or more. We'll use your choices and the connected bills to help you send a message to your elected officials.
Answer the policy questions below or skip any that don't fit your view. We use only your answers and the bills they connect to for your message.
1 bill on this topic
“Chinese imports should be valued for tariffs by their U.S. selling price with Customs checks, and low-value packages from covered nations such as China should lose the $800 duty-free small-package treatment.”
1 bill on this topic
“Low-value overseas packages should pay the same tariffs and go through the same customs checks as any other import.”
1 bill on this topic
“Low-value packages should not get duty-free or tax-free de minimis treatment if they come from, or are shipped from, a country that is both classified as a nonmarket economy and listed for intellectual property concerns.”
1 bill on this topic
“Goods covered by antidumping or countervailing job tasks, safeguard actions, section 301 trade actions, or section 232 national security actions should not be able to use the $800 small-package duty-free benefit.”
1 bill on this topic
“Goods from China should lose de minimis treatment right away, with only a narrow grace period for shipments already loaded or in final transit, while goods from other countries should lose it after 120 days.”
1 bill on this topic
“Many low-value imported packages should no longer enter through the de minimis pathway; they should pay regular job tasks, fees, and taxes and go through normal customs entry steps.”
One sentence is enough. Tell officials how this affects your family, work, bills, neighborhood, or values so the message sounds like you.
Example: My daughter's school closed twice last fall because of wildfire smoke.
Step 2 of 3 · Add your info next
Answer at least one question to continue
