Decide whether AI infrastructure, power projects, and data centers should get faster permits or special legal protections.
Answer what matters
Skip any question. Your message only uses the topics and provisions you answer.
Related legislation
4 related bills are tracked for context, but none have a time-sensitive action window right now.
Track what happens
After sending, you can choose updates as votes, cosponsorships, and related bills move.
Official status
Enter your ZIP to see recorded votes, cosponsorships, and petition signatures tied to this subject.
Tell us where you stand
Answer the policy questions below or skip any that do not fit your view. We'll map only your answers to the bills in Congress and draft your message.
1 bill on this topic
“The federal government should be able to treat some major AI data centers and their power systems as part of national defense.”
1 bill on this topic
“Congress should receive regular, detailed information about China’s artificial intelligence strength so it can make better national security and technology decisions.”
1 bill on this topic
“Data center projects should be able to keep moving after federal permits are issued, even when a court finds problems in the environmental review.”
1 bill on this topic
“The federal government should study how AI and data centers affect the power grid before making bigger energy decisions.”
2 bills on this topic
“Federal agencies should speed up permits for major AI power projects while still reviewing their effects carefully.”
1 bill on this topic
“Legal challenges to federal data center permits should go quickly through the federal appeals court for the project area, with strict filing deadlines.”
1 bill on this topic
“Federal money should help secure reliable electricity for critical needs, but it should not put taxpayers behind risky or highly polluting projects without limits.”
1 bill on this topic
“Defense-related power projects should still follow modern pollution rules unless a narrow emergency truly requires an exception.”
Optional, but recommended. Your selections come from relevant bills in Congress; if something is missing or you want a specific point included, add it here.
Example: My daughter's school closed twice last fall because of wildfire smoke.
Step 2 of 3 · Add your info next
Your message will cover 4 bills in Congress
A Yale field experiment found legislators shown actual district opinion shifted their votes to match it. The ones kept in the dark? No relationship between constituent views and how they voted.
Offices log, sort, tag, and tally incoming contact, then brief the member. Constituent communications eat roughly a third of House staff resources. Your message gets counted.
92% of staff say individualized messages influence undecided lawmakers — versus 56% for form letters. Naming a specific bill with your own reasoning puts you in a different category entirely.
When offices don’t hear from constituents, they ask lobbyists instead. Not contacting your rep doesn’t leave the scale empty — it hands the weight to someone else.
These are related bills tracked for context. None have a time-sensitive action window on this subject right now.
