Contact Congress about S. 130: Competition and Antitrust Law Enforcement Reform Act of 2025

Big mergers would face a lower legal bar for challenge. Dominant companies could face large penalties for blocking rivals, and whistleblowers could get stronger protection and rewards.

Modern Action explains legislation in plain English, helps you choose whether to support, oppose, or ask for changes, and drafts a message tied to the bill, your stance, and the elected officials who can act on it.

Competition and Antitrust Law Enforcement Reform Act of 2025 is a Senate bill in committee. The latest recorded action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

Latest action on S. 130: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

Who this affects: This bill mainly affects large companies, companies planning mergers, dominant firms, workers, suppliers, consumers, small businesses, whistleblowers, and antitrust lawyers and enforcers. Companies would face more proof, reporting, and penalty risk. Workers, suppliers, consumers, and small businesses could see stronger tools against deals or conduct that reduce competition. Whistleblowers could get stronger protection and, in some criminal cases, a share of collected fines.

Why this matters: This bill matters because it would change how hard it is to stop big deals and punish conduct that blocks competition. Today, antitrust cases can turn on high proof burdens, market definitions, and long court fights. The bill would lower some barriers for enforcers and private plaintiffs. It could lead to more challenges, larger penalties, more public market data, and more court cases instead of private arbitration.

Key provisions in S. 130

• The bill would make mergers easier to challenge under the Clayton Act, a major antitrust law. A deal could be blocked if it creates a real risk of serious harm to competition, including harm from powerful buyers or employers.
• Large or highly concentrating mergers would face clear warning lines. When a deal crosses those lines, the companies must prove it will not seriously harm competition.
• Companies that settle merger cases with the Justice Department or Federal Trade Commission would have to report for five years. Their top officers must swear the reports are true, and the reports must cover prices, quality, efficiencies, and whether the fix worked.
• The bill would create an Office of the Competition Advocate inside the Federal Trade Commission. Its leader would serve a seven-year term, be hard to remove, have subpoena power over covered companies, and report to Congress.
• The bill would create an Office of Market Analysis and Data at the Federal Trade Commission. It would publish databases and reports on market concentration, merger enforcement, industries, labor markets, and demographic groups.

How Modern Action helps you take action on S. 130

You do not have to start with a blank letter. Modern Action turns the bill, your position, and the relevant congressional context into a message you can edit and send. The goal is to make contacting Congress clear, specific, and useful without forcing you to parse bill text or figure out the right office on your own.

Questions people ask about S. 130

What is S. 130?

Big mergers would face a lower legal bar for challenge. Dominant companies could face large penalties for blocking rivals, and whistleblowers could get stronger protection and rewards.

How do I support or oppose S. 130?

Choose support, oppose, or ask for changes on Modern Action. The action flow drafts the message for you and keeps the wording tied to this bill.

Who should I contact about S. 130?

Modern Action uses your location to route the action to the congressional offices relevant to the bill and your representation.

Can Modern Action explain S. 130 before I act?

Yes. Modern Action gives you a plain-English summary, current status, and action context before you send anything.