Pick one or more. We'll use your choices and the connected bills to help you send a message to your elected officials.
Answer the policy questions below or skip any that don't fit your view. We use only your answers and the bills they connect to for your message.
1 bill on this topic
“Covered crypto miners should have to measure and report pollution from on-site energy sources and from purchased electricity, steam, heat, or cooling, even if they emit less than the usual 25,000-ton reporting cutoff.”
1 bill on this topic
“Large data centers and crypto mining sites should pay more when their electricity creates more climate pollution.”
2 bills on this topic
“EPA should be authorized to use dedicated federal money for crypto mining emissions reporting, air permit review, and a national study of crypto mining's environmental and energy impacts.”
1 bill on this topic
“Federal agencies should study where covered crypto mining operations are located, how much energy they use, what pollution they cause, how they affect the electric grid, water, waste, noise, and public health, and how different blockchain methods and utility deals affect those impacts.”
1 bill on this topic
“Federal agencies should apply carbon intensity tracking to major energy-heavy industries, require covered factories to report emissions, electricity use, and production each year, calculate pollution per ton, and publish key carbon numbers and covered goods lists.”
1 bill on this topic
“Covered factories should have to send yearly reports on their pollution, electricity use, power contracts, and how much covered product they made so carbon charges can be calculated.”
1 bill on this topic
“Companies should have a voluntary way to share product emissions data with federal agencies, and U.S. trade officials should study whether current law can require importers to provide missing data.”
1 bill on this topic
“Product emissions reports should explain how the numbers were calculated, list the data sources and tariff codes used, identify weak or missing product-level data, and use a broader product group when a narrower estimate is not reliable enough.”
1 bill on this topic
“A federal product emissions-data program should not give agencies new authority to make U.S. producers of covered products submit mandatory reports.”
1 bill on this topic
“Product emissions numbers should count supply-chain pollution from materials, processing, manufacturing, and assembly; use suitable measurement units; give credit for recycled or reused materials; and label broader estimates when exact data is missing.”
One sentence is enough. Tell officials how this affects your family, work, bills, neighborhood, or values so the message sounds like you.
Example: My daughter's school closed twice last fall because of wildfire smoke.
Step 2 of 3 · Add your info next
Answer at least one question to continue
