Rules for AI-generated likenesses, digital replicas, deepfakes, performer consent, copyright training data, provenance labels, and platform takedowns.
Pick one or more. We'll use your choices and the connected bills to help you send a message to your elected officials.
Answer the policy questions below or skip any that don't fit your view. We use only your answers and the bills they connect to for your message.
1 bill on this topic
“People who create training datasets for consumer generative AI systems should have to tell the Copyright Office, and file another notice after major dataset updates, refinements, or retraining.”
1 bill on this topic
“Copyright owners should be able to ask a federal court for a subpoena requiring a generative AI developer to show whether the owner's works were used to train a covered AI model.”
1 bill on this topic
“Businesses should need informed permission before using source-labeled covered works for commercial AI training or synthetic content generation, and authorized users should follow the owner’s use and payment terms.”
1 bill on this topic
“Right holders, parents or guardians of minors, license holders, controllers of a deceased person’s rights, and certain exclusive recording partners or distributors should be able to sue within 3 years after discovering an unauthorized digital replica, and courts should be able to order damages, stop the conduct, and award lawyer fees.”
1 bill on this topic
“Living people should keep control of their digital replica rights, while allowing written licenses for specific uses, extra court-approved limits for children, union-negotiated terms, and continued use when the license allowed it.”
1 bill on this topic
“Platforms seeking liability protection should publish a contact for digital-replica complaints, remove reported unauthorized replicas after valid notices, tell uploaders, face penalties for knowingly false takedown claims, and be allowed to restore removed content if the uploader quickly files a federal lawsuit challenging the notice.”
1 bill on this topic
“Rules about who controls realistic AI copies of your voice and face”
1 bill on this topic
“Digital replica limits should protect uses like news, documentaries, history, commentary, criticism, scholarship, satire, parody, and tiny passing uses, while treating sexually explicit digital replicas differently.”
1 bill on this topic
“News, documentaries, history, biography, commentary, criticism, scholarship, satire, parody, sports broadcasts, small passing uses, and related ads should have exceptions from digital-replica liability, but those usual exceptions should not protect covered sexual digital replicas.”
1 bill on this topic
“Digital-copy lawsuits should leave room for news, sports, documentaries, history, biography, commentary, criticism, scholarship, satire, parody, and brief minor appearances, while sexually explicit digital replicas would not get those speech-related protections and a label alone would not make an unauthorized copy legal.”
1 bill on this topic
“People should have a federal right to control highly realistic computer-made copies of their voice or appearance, while ordinary authorized sampling, remixing, remastering, or similar edits would not count just for that reason.”
1 bill on this topic
“Federal agencies should work with companies, creators, and researchers to create voluntary standards, test detection and labeling tools, run prize contests, and study better ways to protect AI watermarks and source labels.”
1 bill on this topic
“Each person should have a federal property right to control who uses their face or voice, including AI-made copies, and to sell, license, or transfer that right.”
1 bill on this topic
“Rules protecting news, commentary, satire, parody, and other forms of expression from being sued under this law, except when it involves sexually explicit fakes”
1 bill on this topic
“AI tools should have to clearly tell people when they create or substantially change images, video, audio, mixed media, text, or chatbot answers.”
1 bill on this topic
“Rules that tell online platforms how to handle AI fakes, including when they must remove content and what protections they get for following the rules”
1 bill on this topic
“Heirs, estates, or other right holders should be able to control realistic digital copies of a person's voice or image after death for up to 70 years if renewals are met, with a public Copyright Office record system for those renewals.”
1 bill on this topic
“Rules about who controls AI copies of a person's voice and face after they die, how long those rights last, and how heirs keep them active”
1 bill on this topic
“Owners of source-labeled covered content should be able to sue over wrongly removed source information or unauthorized commercial AI use, and ask courts to stop the conduct, award compensation, and cover legal costs within a four-year discovery window.”
1 bill on this topic
“The Copyright Office should have to run a public online database where people can see filed notices about covered AI training datasets.”
1 bill on this topic
“AI tools and services should not be liable just because they can make digital replicas, but they could face liability if they are mainly built, useful, or promoted for making unauthorized replicas.”
1 bill on this topic
“After two years, commercial AI and creative tools should have to let users add source labels, and tool providers should make user-chosen labels computer-readable and reasonably hard to remove when technically possible.”
1 bill on this topic
“People sued over AI uses of a real person's face or voice should be able to raise free speech defenses, and courts should weigh harm against factors like relevance, transformation, and public-interest commentary.”
1 bill on this topic
“People should not knowingly remove or interfere with source labels to help deceptive business practices, and large covered websites and apps should generally keep user-accessible source labels attached, with a narrow exception for necessary security research.”
1 bill on this topic
“People and companies should be liable when they offer public AI cloning services without consent, knowingly share unauthorized AI face or voice copies, or meaningfully help those violations happen.”
1 bill on this topic
“Deals to use an AI copy of someone's performance in an ad or creative work should be written, involve a lawyer for adults or court approval for minors, or follow a union contract.”
One sentence is enough. Tell officials how this affects your family, work, bills, neighborhood, or values so the message sounds like you.
Example: My daughter's school closed twice last fall because of wildfire smoke.
Step 2 of 3 · Add your info next
Answer at least one question to continue
