Pick one or more. We'll use your choices and the connected bills to help you send a message to your elected officials.
Answer the policy questions below or skip any that don't fit your view. We use only your answers and the bills they connect to for your message.
1 bill on this topic
“Federal money should automatically go each year to state and Tribal wildlife conservation and, for four years, to Fish and Wildlife Service endangered species work, without Congress voting on that same money each year.”
1 bill on this topic
“Federal agencies should not spend funds on many listed environmental, climate, water, pollution-reporting, mining, energy, pesticide, land-management, DEI, environmental justice, species-protection, refuge, wilderness, and monument actions while the funding limits apply.”
1 bill on this topic
“Federal grant programs should support wildlife, wetlands, birds, endangered species, international species conservation, and historic preservation, including some preservation grants connected to HBCUs.”
1 bill on this topic
“Endangered species programs should have clear funding and clear roles for federal and state governments.”
1 bill on this topic
“The endangered species fund should pay for recovery grants, agency reviews, partner habitat projects, voluntary conservation agreements, donations, and investments, while excluding listing decisions, some experimental populations, work outside the United States, and federal land purchases.”
1 bill on this topic
“Congress should use annual spending bills to stop environmental and climate rules from taking effect.”
1 bill on this topic
“Congress should authorize named yearly funding amounts from 2025 through 2030 for ESA work such as species reviews, recovery efforts, and conservation partnerships.”
1 bill on this topic
“States and territories receiving wildlife habitat money would have to use at least 15 percent of each allocation to restore habitat for species that are already protected or may soon need protection.”
1 bill on this topic
“States should be able to use federal wildlife money for at-risk species plans, habitat projects, cross-border conservation, invasive species and disease control, related enforcement, and limited education or recreation.”
1 bill on this topic
“States, territories, and D.C. could receive up to $300 million a year from 2025 through 2029 to improve wildlife conservation plans and habitat programs, if Congress provides the money each year.”
1 bill on this topic
“States, territories, and D.C. receiving wildlife habitat money would have to report every two years through 2029 on what they did, what it cost, acres affected, land bought, and measurable conservation results.”
One sentence is enough. Tell officials how this affects your family, work, bills, neighborhood, or values so the message sounds like you.
Example: My daughter's school closed twice last fall because of wildfire smoke.
Step 2 of 3 · Add your info next
Answer at least one question to continue
