U.S. Resumes Blockade Over the Strait of Hormuz
The U.S. has decided to reinstate a blockade of Iranian ports while reversing a proposed fee on cargo passing through the Strait of Hormuz. This shift marks a significant change in U.S. policy regarding Iran. (sources: wsj, nbcnews, aljazeera, cbsnews, bbc)
The U.S. has resumed its blockade of Iranian ports and eliminated a proposed 20% fee on cargo in the Strait of Hormuz. This decision reflects ongoing tensions between the U.S. and Iran.
- The U.S. has reinstated a blockade of Iranian ports.
- A proposed 20% fee on cargo passing through the Strait of Hormuz has been reversed.
- Tensions between the U.S. and Iran continue to escalate over the Strait of Hormuz.
Why it matters
The blockade and fee reversal could impact shipping routes and international trade in the region.
↓ Congress can act on this
7 bills on this issue are moving right now — and the most active one is HR1422: Enhanced Iran Sanctions Act of 2025.
HR1422 · 119th Congress
Enhanced Iran Sanctions Act of 2025
Where do you stand on this bill?
Takes about 60 seconds
About this bill
What HR1422 actually does
This story is about about the Iran war as Trump changes course on 20% fee for Strait of Hormuz cargo. This bill would require sanctions on foreign persons involved in covered Iranian energy transactions and sanctions evasion.
If passed, it would:
- require sanctions on foreign persons involved in covered Iranian energy transactions and sanctions evasion • expand pressure on shipping, insurance, finance, and other logistics tied to Iranian exports.
6 other bills moving on this issue
Take action on any of them individually.
This story is about about the Iran war as Trump changes course on 20% fee for Strait of Hormuz cargo. This bill would impose sanctions on foreign persons involved in covered Iranian energy and logistics transactions.
If passed, it would
- impose sanctions on foreign persons involved in covered Iranian energy and logistics transactions • give senators a direct vehicle to tighten enforcement against maritime sanctions evasion.
This story is about about the Iran war as Trump changes course on 20% fee for Strait of Hormuz cargo. This bill would repeal the sunset of the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996.
If passed, it would
- repeal the sunset of the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996 • preserve long-term sanctions tools tied to Iran’s energy and weapons-related activity.
This story is about about the Iran war as Trump changes course on 20% fee for Strait of Hormuz cargo. This bill would bar certain U.S. port facilities from using enterprises partly or wholly owned by Iran and other listed adversaries.
If passed, it would
- bar certain U.S. port facilities from using enterprises partly or wholly owned by Iran and other listed adversaries • tighten the U.S. side of port-security exposure connected to adversarial states.
This story is about about the Iran war as Trump changes course on 20% fee for Strait of Hormuz cargo. This bill would tighten and codify multiple Iran sanctions authorities.
If passed, it would
- tighten and codify multiple Iran sanctions authorities • require updated federal sanctions guidance for the maritime industry on Iran’s shipping sector.
This story is about about the Iran war as Trump changes course on 20% fee for Strait of Hormuz cargo. This bill would push sanctions policy further into Iran’s energy sector.
If passed, it would
- push sanctions policy further into Iran’s energy sector • strengthen Congress’s hand if lawmakers want tighter economic pressure instead of ad hoc executive trade threats.
This story is about about the Iran war as Trump changes course on 20% fee for Strait of Hormuz cargo. This bill would prohibit federal funds for military force in or against Iran unless Congress specifically authorizes it.
If passed, it would
- prohibit federal funds for military force in or against Iran unless Congress specifically authorizes it • clarify that earlier AUMFs do not authorize war against Iran.
Sources used · 9 sources