Supreme Court ruling prompts review of trans athlete policies in states
The Supreme Court's recent ruling on transgender athletes has raised questions about state policies regarding women's sports. Many states currently do not have laws addressing this issue. (sources: foxnews, nytimes)
Following the Supreme Court ruling, 23 states still allow transgender athletes to compete in women's sports. The ruling does not mandate changes, but it may influence future legislative actions.
- The Supreme Court ruling does not require states to ban transgender athletes from competing in women's sports.
- Justice Clarence Thomas expressed in his opinion that individuals with gender dysphoria are not women or girls.
- Almost half of U.S. states currently do not have laws prohibiting trans girls and women from participating in women's sports.
Why it matters
The ruling could impact ongoing debates about gender identity and sports participation at the state level.
↓ Congress can act on this
6 bills on this issue are moving right now — and the most active one is H.R.28: Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act of 2025.
H.R.28 · 119th Congress
Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act of 2025
Where do you stand on this bill?
Takes about 60 seconds
About this bill
What H.R.28 actually does
This story is about Conservatives hail Justice Thomas for 'truth bomb' about ruling protecting women's sports. This bill would define Title IX athletics compliance around sex “at birth” for women’s and girls’ teams.
If passed, it would:
- define Title IX athletics compliance around sex “at birth” for women’s and girls’ teams • expose noncompliant federally funded schools to Title IX consequences.
5 other bills moving on this issue
Take action on any of them individually.
This story is about Conservatives hail Justice Thomas for 'truth bomb' about ruling protecting women's sports. This bill would apply the same Title IX athletics rule nationwide through a Senate-origin bill.
If passed, it would
- apply the same Title IX athletics rule nationwide through a Senate-origin bill • give Congress, rather than states alone, a federal eligibility standard for school sports.
This story is about Conservatives hail Justice Thomas for 'truth bomb' about ruling protecting women's sports. This bill would require U.S. Olympic-recognized governing bodies to bar male athletes from female-designated amateur competitions.
If passed, it would
- require U.S. Olympic-recognized governing bodies to bar male athletes from female-designated amateur competitions • define eligibility rules at the Olympic/amateur-governing-body level rather than only in schools.
This story is about Conservatives hail Justice Thomas for 'truth bomb' about ruling protecting women's sports. This bill would condition K-12 and higher-education funding on compliance with federal women’s-sports requirements.
If passed, it would
- condition K-12 and higher-education funding on compliance with federal women’s-sports requirements • require annual certifications tied to those funding conditions.
This story is about Conservatives hail Justice Thomas for 'truth bomb' about ruling protecting women's sports. This bill would apply a sex-based eligibility rule to Olympic and amateur national governing bodies.
If passed, it would
- apply a sex-based eligibility rule to Olympic and amateur national governing bodies • give senators a direct vehicle to shape sports-governance policy beyond K-12 and colleges.
This story is about Conservatives hail Justice Thomas for 'truth bomb' about ruling protecting women's sports. This bill would require school locker rooms tied to education programs to be limited by sex at birth for Title IX compliance.
If passed, it would
- require school locker rooms tied to education programs to be limited by sex at birth for Title IX compliance • create a federal rule for school athletic facilities even where a state has no separate law.