A new federal lawsuit says ICC sanctions are chilling Americans' advocacy work
Two U.S. human-rights groups sued in Manhattan on July 16, saying sanctions imposed over ICC investigations related to Israel are violating the First Amendment and forcing them to stop sharing evidence and advocacy with sanctioned parties. (sources: thehill, apnews.com, theguardian)
The lawsuit claims that the sanctions have a chilling effect on the advocacy efforts of the groups and the ICC. The plaintiffs argue that the sanctions violate their First Amendment rights.
- Two human rights advocacy groups are suing the U.S. government over sanctions against the ICC.
- The lawsuit alleges that the sanctions negatively impact their work on Palestinian rights.
- The plaintiffs claim the sanctions violate their First Amendment rights.
Why it matters
The outcome of this lawsuit could influence the operational capacity of the ICC and the ability of advocacy groups to engage in related work.
Connected public decisions
Follow the issue pages where this story connects to public action.
Contact officials
Act on ICC sanctions and speech rights
See the current decision, choose your position, and send a message through the issue page.
Take action on ICC sanctions and speech rightsSources used · 2 sources