Iran threatens to disrupt Gulf trade over US blockade
Iran's military has issued a warning regarding trade in the Gulf region. The statement comes in response to a US naval blockade affecting Iranian ports. (sources: france24, foxnews, aljazeera, dw, nytimes)
Iran's military leadership has threatened to halt trade in the Gulf and Red Sea if the US does not lift its blockade of Iranian ports. This warning follows ongoing tensions between the two nations.
- Iran's military has indicated it could block trade in the Gulf and Red Sea.
- The threat is a response to a US naval blockade of Iranian ports.
- US leadership has suggested that the conflict in Iran may be nearing resolution.
Why it matters
The situation could impact trade routes and escalate tensions in the region.
↓ Why this is on ModernAction
6 bills on this issue are moving right now — and the most active one is A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress..
SJRES104 · 119th Congress
A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress.
Where do you stand on this bill?
Takes about 60 seconds
About this bill
What SJRES104 actually does
This story is about Iran threatens to halt Red Sea traffic in response to US military blockade of ports. This bill would direct the President to remove U.S. forces from hostilities “within or against Iran” unless Congress authorizes it.
If passed, it would:
- Direct the President to remove U.S. forces from hostilities “within or against Iran” unless Congress authorizes it • Clarify carve-outs for self-defense and certain defensive/intelligence activities.
5 other bills moving on this issue
Take action on any of them individually.
This story is about Iran threatens to halt Red Sea traffic in response to US military blockade of ports. This bill would require sanctions on foreign persons supporting logistical transactions/sanctions evasion tied to Iranian.
If passed, it would
- Require sanctions on foreign persons supporting logistical transactions/sanctions evasion tied to Iranian • Expand the set of sanctionable enabling services (e.g., certain financial/insurance/registry-type support) tied to.
This story is about Iran threatens to halt Red Sea traffic in response to US military blockade of ports. This bill would mandate sanctions tied to logistical transactions/sanctions evasion for Iran’s oil/gas/LNG/petrochemicals.
If passed, it would
- Mandate sanctions tied to logistical transactions/sanctions evasion for Iran’s oil/gas/LNG/petrochemicals • Provide a Senate vehicle that could move independently or be paired with the House approach.
This story is about Iran threatens to halt Red Sea traffic in response to US military blockade of ports. This bill would make the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996 permanent by removing its sunset.
If passed, it would
- Make the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996 permanent by removing its sunset • Maintain a standing sanctions baseline that future administrations would implement/enforce.
This story is about Iran threatens to halt Red Sea traffic in response to US military blockade of ports. This bill would require redesignation of Ansarallah as an FTO and impose property-blocking sanctions.
If passed, it would
- Require redesignation of Ansarallah (Houthis) as an FTO and impose property-blocking sanctions • Require a U.S. strategy aimed at degrading Houthi offensive capabilities and restoring freedom of navigation in the.
This story is about Iran threatens to halt Red Sea traffic in response to US military blockade of ports. This bill would impose sanctions on the Houthis for attacks on international shipping.
If passed, it would
- Impose sanctions on the Houthis for attacks on international shipping • Require recurring executive-branch reporting on Houthi attacks and impacts on freedom of navigation (including an.
Top coverage · 7 sources