Who should I contact about HR6521?

Modern Action routes the drafted message to your House representative when that is the relevant target for this bill, using your address to confirm constituent status.

What does Modern Action include in the message about HR6521?

The draft includes the bill number, your position, the reasons you selected, any personal context you add, and a direct ask such as voting yes, voting no, cosponsoring, opposing, or seeking changes.

In House Committee·Last action 170 days ago

Bill limits DHS arrests at immigration court and check-ins

Q: How do I support or oppose HR6521?

Choose support, opposition, or changes. Modern Action uses that stance, the bill context, and any reasons you choose to draft a message you can review, edit, and send.

Officially: Immigration Court Due Process Protection Act of 2025

People going to immigration court would usually be protected from arrest there unless DHS has a judge-signed warrant. DHS check-in arrests could still happen, but only with written approval from a senior supervisor. The bill also adds yearly oversight reports to Congress.

Use this page to support, oppose, or ask Congress to amend HR6521. Modern Action explains Immigration Court Due Process Protection Act of 2025 in plain English, helps identify the right senators or representative, and drafts a bill-specific message you can review before sending.

Where it stands

Sitting in House Committee

No vote scheduled. Constituent contact is what moves bills out of committee.

What this bill actually does

DHS could not arrest or detain someone inside immigration court for a hearing, or right when they arrive or leave, in most cases. Officers would need a judicial warrant signed by a judge.
These limits would apply while a person's immigration case is still open. They would also keep applying during appeals and during motions to reopen, reconsider, or otherwise challenge a final removal order.
DHS could still act without a judge-signed warrant in an emergency. That exception covers an imminent act of violence or a specific, clearly described threat to life, public safety, or national security.

↓ Why your message matters here

This bill is sitting in committee with no scheduled vote — which means a small number of constituent messages can decide whether it moves forward or quietly dies.

Where your representatives stand

Enter your ZIP to see how your senators and member of Congress have voted, sponsored, or spoken on this bill.

The debate

What people are saying about this bill

✓Arguments in support

Protects Due Process: Supporters argue that the bill ensures individuals can attend their hearings without fear of arrest, which is essential for a fair legal process.
Encourages Compliance: By removing the fear of arrest, the bill may lead to higher attendance rates at court hearings, helping cases to be resolved based on their merits.
Protects Vulnerable Populations: Many in immigration court are vulnerable individuals, such as asylum seekers, who need the opportunity to present their cases without fear.

✕Arguments against

Limits DHS Enforcement: Critics argue that the bill restricts DHS's ability to enforce immigration laws effectively, particularly against non-criminal but removable noncitizens.
Creates Safe Havens: There is concern that the bill could turn immigration courts into "no-enforcement zones," complicating broader enforcement strategies.
Ambiguity Concerns: The phrase "in connection with" is seen as vague, potentially leading to legal confusion and inconsistent enforcement.

Where this bill is in the process

Legislative timeline

✓

Introduced

Introduced in House

—

●

House Committee

Under House committee consideration

Latest: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. (12/9/2025)

DEC 9

○

House Floor Vote

Voted on by House

—

○

Passed House

Approved by House

—

○

Senate Review

Sent to Senate for consideration

—

○

Passed Both Chambers

Approved by both House and Senate

—

○

Signed into Law

Signed by the President

—

For more detail

Read deeper

Questions people ask about contacting Congress on HR6521

How do I support or oppose HR6521, Immigration Court Due Process Protection Act of 2025?

Choose one clear position: support, oppose, or amend. Then pick any reasons or personal context you want included. Modern Action uses that input and the bill context to draft a message you can review, edit, and send.

Who does Modern Action contact about this bill?

Congressional offices prioritize messages from their own constituents. Modern Action uses your address to route the drafted message to your House representative when that is the most relevant target for this bill.

What does Modern Action include in the message?

The draft includes the bill number, your position, the reasons you selected, any personal context you added, and a direct ask such as voting yes, voting no, cosponsoring, opposing, or seeking changes. You stay in control because you review it before it sends.

Take action on HR6521: Immigration Court Due Process Protection Act of 2025

This page is for understanding Immigration Court Due Process Protection Act of 2025, choosing whether you support it, oppose it, or want changes. Modern Action drafts the message before it goes to Congress.

Modern Action keeps the action tied to the bill itself: what it would do, where it is in the process (committee), which office can still act, and what ask belongs in the message.

You are not starting from a blank form. Modern Action drafts the message around HR6521, your stance, and the reasons you choose, then leaves the final review and edits to you.

Menu