House Floor·Last action 25 days ago

Bill blocks sanctuary policies and expands immigration detainer authority

Officially: Expediting Federal Broadband Deployment Reviews Act

H.R. 1681 prevents state and local governments from restricting cooperation with federal immigration enforcement, sets new rules for holding people on immigration detainers, protects agencies that follow detainers from lawsuits, and creates a way for crime victims to sue governments that declined detainers.

Where it stands

House Floor · Floor consideration Mon, Apr 20

Today. Members are taking positions right now.

What this bill actually does

Bars any federal, state, or local government entity, and any individual, from blocking officials from cooperating with or helping enforce U.S. immigration laws.
Protects law enforcement actions like asking about immigration status during crime investigations, notifying federal authorities about suspected criminals, and sharing status and custody information.
Prohibits states and cities from restricting contracts, land sales, funding, or payments related to privately owned immigration detention facilities.

↓ Why your message matters here

The chamber votes today — constituent contact in the final stretch is the single biggest factor in how undecided members break.

The debate

What people are saying about this bill

✓Arguments in support

Speeds up broadband access in underserved regions: The bill aims to reduce the time it takes to approve new internet infrastructure, helping rural areas get online faster.
Boosts economic growth and job creation: By making it easier for telecom companies to expand, the bill could create new jobs in construction and technology.
Improves emergency services and public safety: Better internet access can enhance communication during emergencies, improving response times and coordination.

✕Arguments against

Potential risks to environmental reviews: Some might worry that speeding up the process could lead to less thorough environmental assessments, although the bill does not change existing environmental laws.
Concerns about land preservation: There could be fears that increased development on federal lands might harm natural habitats or landscapes.
Lack of public input: Critics might argue that faster processes could limit opportunities for public comment or involvement in decision-making.

Where this bill is in the process

Legislative timeline

✓

Introduced

Introduced in House

—

✓

House Committee

Under House committee consideration

—

●

House Floor Vote

Voted on by House

Latest: Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 494. (3/26/2026)

MAR 26

○

Passed House

Approved by House

—

○

Senate Review

Sent to Senate for consideration

—

○

Passed Both Chambers

Approved by both House and Senate

—

○

Signed into Law

Signed by the President

—

For more detail

Menu

Bill blocks sanctuary policies and expands immigration detainer authority

What people are saying about this bill

Legislative timeline

Read deeper