Who should I contact about H.R.1526?

Modern Action routes the drafted message to your senators when that is the relevant target for this bill, using your address to confirm constituent status.

What does Modern Action include in the message about H.R.1526?

The draft includes the bill number, your position, the reasons you selected, any personal context you add, and a direct ask such as voting yes, voting no, cosponsoring, opposing, or seeking changes.

In Senate Committee·Last action 413 days ago

Bill would curb nationwide court orders by single federal judges

Q: How do I support or oppose H.R.1526?

Choose support, opposition, or changes. Modern Action uses that stance, the bill context, and any reasons you choose to draft a message you can review, edit, and send.

Officially: NORRA of 2025 No Rogue Rulings Act of 2025

One federal trial judge usually could not stop a federal policy for everyone nationwide. Most court orders would cover only the people in the case, unless a special three-judge panel hears a qualifying multi-state lawsuit.

Use this page to support, oppose, or ask Congress to amend H.R.1526. Modern Action explains NORRA of 2025 No Rogue Rulings Act of 2025 in plain English, helps identify the right senators or representative, and drafts a bill-specific message you can review before sending.

Where it stands

Sitting in the Judiciary

No vote scheduled. Constituent contact is what moves bills out of committee.

What this bill actually does

In most lawsuits, a federal trial court could stop only the people in the case from acting, plus any outsiders they legally represent under the federal rules for civil cases.
That would mostly end broad orders like nationwide injunctions from a single district judge, except in one special kind of multi-state case.
If at least two states from different federal court circuits sue over an executive branch action, a randomly chosen three-judge panel would have to hear the case under the current federal three-judge-court law.

↓ Why your message matters here

This bill is sitting in committee with no scheduled vote — which means a small number of constituent messages can decide whether it moves forward or quietly dies.

Where your representatives stand

Enter your ZIP to see how your senators and member of Congress have voted, sponsored, or spoken on this bill.

The debate

What people are saying about this bill

✓Arguments in support

Prevents nationwide policy disruptions: Supporters argue that the bill stops single judges from blocking federal policies across the entire country, ensuring consistent policy enforcement.
Restores separation of powers: By limiting judicial overreach, the bill maintains a clear distinction between the roles of the judiciary and the executive branch.
Reduces forum shopping: Plaintiffs cannot choose sympathetic courts to get sweeping injunctions, promoting fairness in the judicial process.

✕Arguments against

Limits court power to stop unlawful actions: Critics argue that the bill weakens the courts' ability to quickly halt potentially unconstitutional policies, delaying relief for widespread issues.
Undermines judicial independence: The requirement for random three-judge panels in multi-state cases could politicize the process and reduce the effectiveness of urgent judicial interventions.
Challenges for states and individuals: Those challenging federal actions might find it harder to obtain effective relief, especially if they are not part of a multi-state lawsuit.

Where this bill is in the process

Legislative timeline

✓

Introduced

Introduced in House

—

✓

House Committee

Under House committee consideration

—

✓

House Floor Vote

Voted on by House

—

✓

Passed House

Approved by House

—

●

Senate Review

Sent to Senate for consideration

Latest: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (4/10/2025)

APR 10

○

Passed Both Chambers

Approved by both House and Senate

—

○

Signed into Law

Signed by the President

—

For more detail

Read deeper

Questions people ask about contacting Congress on H.R.1526

How do I support or oppose H.R.1526, NORRA of 2025 No Rogue Rulings Act of 2025?

Choose one clear position: support, oppose, or amend. Then pick any reasons or personal context you want included. Modern Action uses that input and the bill context to draft a message you can review, edit, and send.

Who does Modern Action contact about this bill?

Congressional offices prioritize messages from their own constituents. Modern Action uses your address to route the drafted message to your senators when that is the most relevant target for this bill.

What does Modern Action include in the message?

The draft includes the bill number, your position, the reasons you selected, any personal context you added, and a direct ask such as voting yes, voting no, cosponsoring, opposing, or seeking changes. You stay in control because you review it before it sends.

Take action on H.R.1526: NORRA of 2025 No Rogue Rulings Act of 2025

This page is for understanding NORRA of 2025 No Rogue Rulings Act of 2025, choosing whether you support it, oppose it, or want changes. Modern Action drafts the message before it goes to Congress.

Modern Action keeps the action tied to the bill itself: what it would do, where it is in the process (committee), which office can still act, and what ask belongs in the message.

You are not starting from a blank form. Modern Action drafts the message around H.R.1526, your stance, and the reasons you choose, then leaves the final review and edits to you.

Menu