Decide whether Congress should pause the largest AI data centers while it studies worker, electricity, water, and community safeguards.
Answer what matters
Skip any question. Your message only uses the topics and provisions you answer.
Related legislation
3 related bills are tracked for context, but none have a time-sensitive action window right now.
Track what happens
After sending, you can choose updates as votes, cosponsorships, and related bills move.
Official status
Enter your ZIP to see recorded votes, cosponsorships, and petition signatures tied to this subject.
Tell us where you stand
Answer the policy questions below or skip any that do not fit your view. We'll map only your answers to the bills in Congress and draft your message.
1 bill on this topic
“Workers and the public should share in the gains from artificial intelligence and be protected from major job losses caused by automation.”
1 bill on this topic
“The government should be able to pause very large AI data center projects until stronger rules are in place.”
1 bill on this topic
“Large artificial intelligence data centers should not raise household bills, damage the environment, or be built without affected communities having a real say.”
1 bill on this topic
“Public money should not be used to support private artificial intelligence data centers unless the projects meet strong public-interest rules.”
2 bills on this topic
“Local partners who benefit from a water project should share the cost, while federal support should be limited and clearly justified.”
1 bill on this topic
“Artificial intelligence data center projects should create well-paid jobs with strong training and worker protections.”
Optional, but recommended. Your selections come from relevant bills in Congress; if something is missing or you want a specific point included, add it here.
Example: My daughter's school closed twice last fall because of wildfire smoke.
Step 2 of 3 · Add your info next
Your message will cover 3 bills in Congress
A Yale field experiment found legislators shown actual district opinion shifted their votes to match it. The ones kept in the dark? No relationship between constituent views and how they voted.
Offices log, sort, tag, and tally incoming contact, then brief the member. Constituent communications eat roughly a third of House staff resources. Your message gets counted.
92% of staff say individualized messages influence undecided lawmakers — versus 56% for form letters. Naming a specific bill with your own reasoning puts you in a different category entirely.
When offices don’t hear from constituents, they ask lobbyists instead. Not contacting your rep doesn’t leave the scale empty — it hands the weight to someone else.
These are related bills tracked for context. None have a time-sensitive action window on this subject right now.
