U.S. conducts strikes in Iran amid ongoing peace talks
The U.S. military has carried out strikes in Iran, citing self-defense. This action has raised concerns about the future of peace negotiations. (sources: france24, cbsnews, aljazeera, theguardian, washingtonpost)
The U.S. launched strikes targeting Iranian missile sites and mine-laying vessels, asserting self-defense. Iran has accused the U.S. of violating a ceasefire and has warned of potential retaliation.
- The U.S. conducted strikes in southern Iran amid ongoing peace talks.
- Iran claims to have downed a U.S. drone during this period.
- Iran has warned of retaliation against the U.S. for the strikes.
Why it matters
The situation could significantly affect the trajectory of U.S.-Iran relations and the potential for a peace agreement.
↓ Why this is on Modern Action
3 bills on this issue are moving right now — and the most active one is S2087: No War Against Iran Act.
S2087 · 119th Congress
No War Against Iran Act
Where do you stand on this bill?
Takes about 60 seconds
About this bill
What S2087 actually does
This story is about Iran looking to 'buy time to rebuild its military' amid talks to end war. This bill would After U.S. “self-defense” strikes, this bill is a direct congressional check on escalation by restricting funding for military force against.
If passed, it would:
- Prohibit obligating federal funds for military force against Iran without a declaration of war or specific • Reassert Congress’s role over sustained hostilities (with carve-outs defined in the bill text.
2 other bills moving on this issue
Take action on any of them individually.
This story is about Iran looking to 'buy time to rebuild its military' amid talks to end war. This bill would military: Require/expand sanctions tied to logistical transactions and sanctions evasion involving Iranian oil/gas/LNG/petrochemical product.
If passed, it would
- Require/expand sanctions tied to logistical transactions and sanctions evasion involving Iranian • Increase pressure on third parties that facilitate those transactions.
This story is about Iran looking to 'buy time to rebuild its military' amid talks to end war. This bill would This is the Senate vehicle aligned with the same core approach as H.R.1422—using sanctions enforcement to limit resources that would support.
If passed, it would
- Expand/mandate sanctions related to logistical transactions and sanctions evasion involving Iranian • Put Senate pressure behind an enforce-sanctions posture while talks/ceasefire debates are active.
Top coverage · 10 sources