U.S. reviews Iran's proposal for Strait of Hormuz
The White House has discussed Iran's proposal to end its blockade on the Strait of Hormuz. U.S. officials emphasize that any agreement must include a nuclear deal. (sources: nbcnews, dw, aljazeera, wsj, france24)
Trump met with national security advisers to review Iran's proposal. The U.S. has expressed skepticism about the plan without a nuclear agreement.
- Iran proposed to end its blockade on the Strait of Hormuz.
- The U.S. has not ruled out the proposal but insists on a nuclear deal.
- Trump discussed the proposal with national security advisers.
Why it matters
The outcome of these discussions could impact regional stability and oil prices.
↓ Why this is on ModernAction
4 bills on this issue are moving right now — and the most active one is Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran..
HCONRES40 · 119th Congress
Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
Where do you stand on this bill?
Takes about 60 seconds
About this bill
What HCONRES40 actually does
This story is about U.S. appears cool on Iran proposal to end war and reopen Hormuz without a nuclear deal. This bill would direct the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities against Iran absent a declaration of war or specific.
If passed, it would:
- Direct the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities against Iran absent a declaration of war or specific • Reassert congressional control over continued escalation while diplomacy/ceasefire talks proceed.
3 other bills moving on this issue
Take action on any of them individually.
This story is about Iran war: US wary of peace plan postponing nuclear deal. This bill would impose sanctions on persons involved in logistical transactions and sanctions evasion related to Iranian oil, gas, LNG.
If passed, it would
- Impose sanctions on persons involved in logistical transactions and sanctions evasion related to Iranian oil, gas, LNG • Increase pressure/enforcement leverage around Iran’s energy-export supply chain during any “peace plan” or.
This story is about Iran war: US wary of peace plan postponing nuclear deal. This bill would impose sanctions regarding logistical transactions and sanctions evasion tied to Iranian oil, gas, LNG, and petrochemicals.
If passed, it would
- Impose sanctions regarding logistical transactions and sanctions evasion tied to Iranian oil, gas, LNG • Expand pressure on third parties facilitating Iranian energy exports.
This story is about U.S. appears cool on Iran proposal to end war and reopen Hormuz without a nuclear deal. This bill would prohibit certain sanctions licenses/waivers unless the President certifies the covered foreign persons have ceased.
If passed, it would
- Prohibit certain sanctions licenses/waivers unless the President certifies the covered foreign persons have ceased • Constrain executive flexibility to use sanctions relief as a bargaining chip in near-term de-escalation proposals.
Top coverage · 14 sources