Trump responds to Supreme Court ruling on mail-in ballots
Trump responds to Supreme Court ruling on mail-in ballots (nbcnews); Supreme Court Decision on Late-Arriving Mail-In Ballots Grants Relief to 18 States (nytimes) (sources: nbcnews, nytimes, cbsnews, cbc)
Trump responds to Supreme Court ruling on mail-in ballots (nbcnews); Supreme Court Decision on Late-Arriving Mail-In Ballots Grants Relief to 18 States (nytimes)
- Trump responds to Supreme Court ruling on mail-in ballots (nbcnews)
- Supreme Court Decision on Late-Arriving Mail-In Ballots Grants Relief to 18 States (nytimes)
↓ Congress can act on this
6 bills on this issue are moving right now — and the most active one is HR7265: Vote by Mail Tracking Act.
HR7265 · 119th Congress
Vote by Mail Tracking Act
Where do you stand on this bill?
Takes about 60 seconds
About this bill
What HR7265 actually does
This story is about Supreme Court Decision on Late-Arriving Mail-In Ballots Grants Relief to 18 States. This bill would require mailed ballot envelopes to use USPS barcode tracking and election-mail design standards.
If passed, it would:
- require mailed ballot envelopes to use USPS barcode tracking and election-mail design standards • make it easier for voters and officials to trace ballots through the mailstream.
5 other bills moving on this issue
Take action on any of them individually.
This story is about Supreme Court Decision on Late-Arriving Mail-In Ballots Grants Relief to 18 States. This bill would require election officials to count mailed federal ballots postmarked by Election Day and received within 7 days after it.
If passed, it would
- require election officials to count mailed federal ballots postmarked by Election Day and received within 7 days after • require USPS same-day ballot processing, barcode tracking, postmarks, and free postage for completed ballots.
This story is about Supreme Court Decision on Late-Arriving Mail-In Ballots Grants Relief to 18 States. This bill would require all eligible voters to be able to vote by mail in federal elections.
If passed, it would
- require all eligible voters to be able to vote by mail in federal elections • require ballots to be mailed out in advance and carried free of postage.
This story is about Supreme Court Decision on Late-Arriving Mail-In Ballots Grants Relief to 18 States. This bill would bar states from imposing extra eligibility hurdles on mail voting in federal elections.
If passed, it would
- bar states from imposing extra eligibility hurdles on mail voting in federal elections • require notice and an opportunity to cure defective absentee or mail ballots.
This story is about Supreme Court Decision on Late-Arriving Mail-In Ballots Grants Relief to 18 States. This bill would require mail ballots in federal elections to be received by the time polls close on Election Day.
If passed, it would
- require mail ballots in federal elections to be received by the time polls close on Election Day • also add national rules on ballot handling, result reporting, and voter-registration systems.
This story is about Supreme Court Decision on Late-Arriving Mail-In Ballots Grants Relief to 18 States. This bill would require states to finish counting federal-election ballots by 10:00 p.m. on Election Day.
If passed, it would
- require states to finish counting federal-election ballots by 10:00 p.m. on Election Day • require certification of results within 48 hours, subject to limited emergency exceptions.
Top coverage · 7 sources