Trump Appoints James McDonald as U.S. Attorney for Manhattan
James M. McDonald has been named to lead the U.S. Attorney's Office in Manhattan. He has previously served as a federal prosecutor and has been part of Trump's legal team. (sources: nytimes, ap, reuters)
James M. McDonald has been appointed as the U.S. Attorney for Manhattan, taking over a significant federal prosecutor's office. His recent work includes involvement in legal matters related to Trump.
- James M. McDonald is a veteran former federal prosecutor.
- McDonald has been part of Trump's legal team, appealing a criminal conviction.
- The U.S. Attorney's Office in Manhattan is a prominent federal prosecutor's office.
Why it matters
This appointment may influence ongoing legal proceedings and the direction of federal prosecution in New York.
↓ Congress can act on this
4 bills on this issue are moving right now — and the most active one is S3307: Inspector General Access Act of 2025.
S3307 · 119th Congress
Inspector General Access Act of 2025
Where do you stand on this bill?
Takes about 60 seconds
About this bill
What S3307 actually does
This story is about Trump Again Picks Personal Lawyer for a Top Job, as U.S. Attorney in Manhattan. This bill would broaden the Justice Department Inspector General's power to investigate misconduct.
3 other bills moving on this issue
Take action on any of them individually.
This story is about Trump Again Picks Personal Lawyer for a Top Job, as U.S. Attorney in Manhattan. This bill would let more federal officials move state lawsuits and criminal cases into federal court.
Take action on H.R.1789 →This story is about Trump Again Picks Personal Lawyer for a Top Job, as U.S. Attorney in Manhattan. This bill would create a House-specific route for DOJ oversight reform tied to this same concern abo
Take action on HR4612 →This story is about Trump Again Picks Personal Lawyer for a Top Job, as U.S. Attorney in Manhattan. This bill would direct anti-politicization rule for federal attorneys, closely aligned with concerns that leadership ties or political con
Take action on S3874 →