Supreme Court declines to hear Trump's appeal in Carroll case
The U.S. Supreme Court has decided not to review the verdict in the E. Jean Carroll case. This decision follows a judgment against Trump for sexual abuse and defamation. (sources: abcnews, reuters, thehill, aljazeera, nbcnews)
The Supreme Court rejected Trump's appeal regarding the E. Jean Carroll case, which found him liable for sexual abuse and defamation. Carroll's attorneys stated it is time for Trump to fulfill his obligations following the verdict.
- The Supreme Court declined to hear Trump's appeal with no dissenting opinions.
- The verdict found Trump liable for sexually abusing Carroll and defaming her.
- Carroll's legal team expressed that it is time for Trump to pay the judgment.
Why it matters
The Supreme Court's decision upholds the lower court's ruling, impacting the legal and financial responsibilities of Trump in this case.
↓ Congress can act on this
4 bills on this issue are moving right now — and the most active one is H.R.5342: Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2026.
H.R.5342 · 119th Congress
Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2026
Where do you stand on this bill?
Takes about 60 seconds
About this bill
What H.R.5342 actually does
This story is about US Supreme Court rebuffs Trump's appeal in E Jean Carroll case. This bill would fund sexual-assault victims assistance and trauma-informed law-enforcement training.
If passed, it would:
- fund sexual-assault victims assistance and trauma-informed law-enforcement training • fund an initiative to enhance prosecution and investigation of online abuse and harassment.
3 other bills moving on this issue
Take action on any of them individually.
This story is about US Supreme Court rebuffs Trump's appeal in E Jean Carroll case. This bill would exclude qualifying sexual-assault or sexual-harassment judgments, awards.
If passed, it would
- exclude qualifying sexual-assault or sexual-harassment judgments, awards • make civil recoveries more financially meaningful for survivors who successfully sue.
This story is about US Supreme Court rebuffs Trump's appeal in E Jean Carroll case. This bill would increase certain grant funding for states that provide sexual-assault survivors rights at least as protective as federal.
If passed, it would
- increase certain grant funding for states that provide sexual-assault survivors rights at least as protective as • use federal funding incentives to improve evidence-preservation and survivor-notice practices at the state level.
This story is about US Supreme Court rebuffs Trump's appeal in E Jean Carroll case. This bill would create a civil action for non-consensual sexual protection barrier removal.
If passed, it would
- create a civil action for non-consensual sexual protection barrier removal • let victims sue for damages in federal court.
Top coverage · 7 sources