H.R. 1919, known as the Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act, is a proposed law that aims to stop the Federal Reserve from creating a digital version of the U.S. dollar. This bill is designed to protect people's financial privacy and prevent government overreach in digital transactions.
What This Bill Does
The Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act is a bill that would change how the Federal Reserve operates when it comes to digital money. Right now, there's a lot of talk about creating a digital version of the U.S. dollar, called a central bank digital currency (CBDC). This bill wants to make sure that doesn't happen. It stops the Federal Reserve from making or giving out a digital dollar to people. The idea is to keep the government from being able to track every single purchase or money transfer you make.
The bill also says that the Federal Reserve can't use a digital dollar to control the economy or keep tabs on people. It wants to make sure that any big changes like creating a digital dollar have to be approved by Congress first. This means that the people we vote for would have a say in whether or not a digital dollar becomes a reality.
By putting these rules in place, the bill aims to protect the role of regular banks. It doesn't want the Federal Reserve to act like a bank where you could have an account. Instead, it wants to keep things the way they are, where you bank with private companies.
Why It Matters
This bill could have a big impact on how we use money in the future. If it passes, there won't be a government-issued digital dollar. This means that people who don't have bank accounts might miss out on an easy way to make digital payments. Right now, about 5% of U.S. households don't have a bank account, and a digital dollar could have helped them.
On the other hand, the bill is designed to protect your privacy. Without a digital dollar, the government won't be able to track your spending as easily. Supporters say this is important for keeping your financial information private and stopping government overreach.
Key Facts
- Cost/Budget Impact: The Congressional Budget Office estimates the bill would have a negligible direct budget impact.
- Timeline for Implementation: The bill would take effect immediately upon enactment, changing the Federal Reserve Act.
- Number of People Affected: The bill would affect all Americans by preventing access to a government-issued digital dollar.
- Key Dates: Introduced on March 6, 2025, and passed the House on July 17, 2025.
- First-of-its-kind Ban: The U.S. would be the first major economy to explicitly prohibit a central bank digital currency for retail use.
- Bipartisan Support: The bill has strong bipartisan support with over 135 cosponsors in the House.
- Global Context: The bill is a response to other countries like China developing their own digital currencies.
Arguments in Support
- Protection of Financial Privacy: Supporters believe the bill will prevent the government from tracking every transaction, protecting individual privacy.
- Prevention of Government Overreach: The bill ensures that any decision to create a digital dollar must go through Congress, preserving democratic oversight.
- Preservation of Private Banking: By stopping the Federal Reserve from acting like a bank, the bill protects the role of private banks in the economy.
- Encouragement of Innovation: The bill supports private digital currencies and stablecoins, encouraging innovation in the financial sector.
- Limiting Surveillance: It acts as a safeguard against creating a surveillance state where financial transactions could be used to control citizens.
Arguments in Opposition
- Loss of Global Competitiveness: Critics argue that not having a digital dollar could make the U.S. fall behind other countries like China, which already has a digital currency.
- Reduced Financial Inclusion: A digital dollar could help people without bank accounts access digital payments, and blocking it might leave them out.
- Limited Monetary Policy Tools: Opponents say that a digital dollar could give the Federal Reserve new ways to manage the economy, especially in crises.
- Increased Private Sector Risk: By favoring private digital currencies, the bill might expose consumers to riskier, less regulated financial products.
- Missed Modernization Opportunities: A digital dollar could improve payment systems by making transactions faster and cheaper, which this bill would prevent.
