PRIORITY BILLS:Unable to load updates
ModernAction Logo
S472
S472
Awaiting Senate Floor Vote

Forest Service Would Keep Ski Resort Fees to Fund Local Recreation and Safety

Officially: Ski Hill Resources for Economic Development Act

This bill lets the Forest Service keep ski area permit fees instead of sending them to the general federal budget. Most of the money would go back to the forests where it was collected for trail maintenance, visitor safety, and permit processing.

Where it stands

floor_pending

Your representatives are deciding where they stand. A few messages can tip the balance.

What this bill actually does
  • Creates a Ski Area Fee Retention Account in the U.S. Treasury for ski resort permit fees collected on national forest land.
  • Ski area permit fees become available for the Forest Service to spend without yearly congressional approval, and the money stays available for four fiscal years.
  • Normally 80% of fees collected at a given national forest must be spent at that same forest — 75% on ski program operations and 25% on recreation, safety, and resource work.

↓ Why your message matters here

This bill is moving through Congress right now — your representative needs to hear from you.

Where do you stand?

Pick a stance and we'll draft a message to your representative in plain English.

The debate

What people are saying about this bill

Arguments in support
  • Economic Growth: Supporters argue that the bill will stimulate local economies by attracting more tourists and creating jobs.
  • Improved Infrastructure: The financial assistance can lead to better facilities and services, enhancing the overall ski experience.
  • Environmental Benefits: By promoting eco-friendly practices, the bill ensures that ski area development is sustainable.
Arguments against
  • Cost Concerns: Critics worry about the financial burden on taxpayers and question if the funds could be better spent elsewhere.
  • Environmental Impact: Some argue that increased development could harm local ecosystems, despite the bill's sustainability provisions.
  • Inequality: Opponents fear that the benefits may not be evenly distributed, with larger ski areas gaining more than smaller ones.

Where this bill is in the process

Legislative timeline

Introduced

Introduced in Senate

Senate Committee

Under Senate committee consideration

Senate Floor Vote

Voted on by Senate

Latest: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 333. (2/11/2026)

FEB 11

Passed Senate

Approved by Senate

House Review

Sent to House for consideration

Passed Both Chambers

Approved by both House and Senate

Signed into Law

Signed by the President

For more detail

Read deeper