ModernAction Logo
S2457 · 119th Congress
In Senate Committee·Last action 262 days ago

S.2457 creates federal domestic terrorism offices and recurring public reports

Officially: Domestic Terrorism Prevention Act of 2025

The bill sets up new domestic terrorism units in DHS, DOJ, and the FBI and requires them to coordinate, train law enforcement, and report data every six months. It puts special emphasis on White supremacist and neo-Nazi threats, includes civil rights compliance requirements, and would stay in place for 10 years unless Congress renews it.

Where it stands

Sitting in the Judiciary

No vote scheduled. Constituent contact is what moves bills out of committee.

What this bill actually does
  • Creates three dedicated domestic terrorism offices: a Domestic Terrorism Unit in DHS's Office of Intelligence and Analysis, a Domestic Terrorism Office in DOJ's National Security Division, and a Domestic Terrorism Section in the FBI's Counterterrorism Division.
  • Requires each new office to have at least one employee focused on civil rights and civil liberties compliance and to give all employees anti-bias training every year.
  • Ends these authorized domestic terrorism offices 10 years after the law takes effect unless Congress reauthorizes them.

↓ Why your message matters here

This bill is sitting in committee with no scheduled vote — which means a small number of constituent messages can decide whether it moves forward or quietly dies.

Where do you stand?

Pick a stance and we'll draft a message to your representative in plain English.

The debate

What people are saying about this bill

Arguments in support
  • Supporters argue that the bill addresses a documented rise in domestic terrorism, especially from White supremacist groups.
  • It improves coordination and capacity across DHS, DOJ, and FBI, creating a more unified response to domestic threats.
  • The bill focuses on data-driven resource allocation, ensuring that the most significant threats receive the most attention.
Arguments against
  • Critics worry about the risk of politicization, where enforcement could be biased based on political viewpoints.
  • There are concerns about civil liberties, as increased data collection might lead to more aggressive investigations.
  • Some argue that the bill duplicates existing authorities and adds unnecessary bureaucracy.

Where this bill is in the process

Legislative timeline

Introduced

Introduced in Senate

Senate Committee

Under Senate committee consideration

Latest: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (7/24/2025)

JUL 24

Senate Floor Vote

Voted on by Senate

Passed Senate

Approved by Senate

House Review

Sent to House for consideration

Passed Both Chambers

Approved by both House and Senate

Signed into Law

Signed by the President

For more detail

Read deeper