ModernAction Logo
S1962 · 119th Congress
In Senate Committee·Last action 309 days ago

Bill blocks some satellite firms from getting new U.S. licenses

Officially: Secure Space Act of 2025

Some satellite and earth-station companies could lose access to new FCC licenses and U.S. market access. The ban reaches certain related companies too, including some with as little as a 10% ownership stake. The FCC would have one year to write the rules.

Where it stands

Commerce · Hearing Tue, Apr 14

In 4 days. Members are taking positions right now.

What this bill actually does
  • This bill adds a new section to the Secure and Trusted Communications Networks Act of 2019. That section would ban certain satellite licenses, U.S. market access, and earth-station approvals.
  • The FCC could not approve geostationary or nongeostationary satellite systems for a company that holds or controls the approval if that company makes or provides covered communications equipment or services.
  • The same ban would apply to individually licensed earth stations and blanket-licensed earth stations. In plain terms, some ground stations could not get FCC approval either.

↓ Why your message matters here

Members are still deciding how to vote — and what they hear from constituents in these final days is what tips undecided ones.

Where do you stand?

Pick a stance and we'll draft a message to your representative in plain English.

The debate

What people are saying about this bill

Arguments in support
  • Could lower security and spying risks by keeping some companies tied to covered equipment or services from controlling satellite systems used in the United States.
  • Matches satellite policy with the 2019 law's wider push to keep risky communications equipment out of U.S. networks. That creates a more consistent security rule across different systems.
  • Could block easy workarounds through related companies. The affiliate rule and 10% ownership rule make it harder for restricted firms to reach U.S.-facing satellite assets through side channels.
Arguments against
  • Could shrink competition in U.S. satellite services if some providers are kept out. That could mean fewer choices for consumers and businesses.
  • Could sweep in companies with weak or indirect ties. The affiliate rule is broad, and the 10% ownership cutoff may block firms that do not clearly pose a risk themselves.
  • Could create uncertainty while the FCC writes the details. That may slow investment and delay new satellite projects.

Where this bill is in the process

Legislative timeline

Introduced

Introduced in Senate

Senate Committee

Under Senate committee consideration

Latest: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. (6/5/2025)

JUN 5

Senate Floor Vote

Voted on by Senate

Passed Senate

Approved by Senate

House Review

Sent to House for consideration

Passed Both Chambers

Approved by both House and Senate

Signed into Law

Signed by the President

For more detail

Read deeper