ModernAction Logo
S1885 · 119th Congress
In Senate Committee·Last action 323 days ago

Social media sites would have to show mental health warnings to U.S. users

Officially: Stop the Scroll Act

People in the United States would see a mental health warning each time they open covered social media platforms. The warning would have to link to federal help, including the 988 crisis line, and it would come back every hour if the person keeps using the platform. Federal and state officials could fine platforms that do not comply.

Where it stands

Commerce · Hearing Tue, Apr 14

In 4 days. Members are taking positions right now.

What this bill actually does
  • This bill covers both regular social media platforms and anonymous posting platforms that run for profit. It does not stop with the biggest mainstream apps.
  • Users in the United States would see a mental health warning every time they access a covered platform. The warning has to show up at the point of entry.
  • The warning has to explain possible negative mental health effects. It also has to give users access to federal help, including the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline.

↓ Why your message matters here

Members are still deciding how to vote — and what they hear from constituents in these final days is what tips undecided ones.

Where do you stand?

Pick a stance and we'll draft a message to your representative in plain English.

The debate

What people are saying about this bill

Arguments in support
  • People would get the same basic mental health warning across major online platforms. That could make risk information easier to notice and understand.
  • People in crisis would get help information right when they use the platform. That includes direct access to federal resources like the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline.
  • This uses a familiar public health tool. Warning labels have long been used to flag possible harms from products like tobacco and alcohol.
Arguments against
  • The government would be forcing private platforms to carry a message. That could trigger free speech fights over compelled speech.
  • Platforms could face real cost and technical work to build these warnings. That burden could hit smaller services especially hard.
  • Users may get annoyed by warnings that reappear every hour. Many people may just click through them without reading.

Where this bill is in the process

Legislative timeline

Introduced

Introduced in Senate

Senate Committee

Under Senate committee consideration

Latest: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. (5/22/2025)

MAY 22

Senate Floor Vote

Voted on by Senate

Passed Senate

Approved by Senate

House Review

Sent to House for consideration

Passed Both Chambers

Approved by both House and Senate

Signed into Law

Signed by the President

For more detail

Read deeper