ModernAction Logo
HR7583 · 119th Congress
In House Committee·Last action 60 days ago

HR 7583 would broadly expand federal workplace harassment protections

Officially: BE HEARD in the Workplace Act

This bill would expand federal workplace discrimination and harassment protections to far more workers and employers. It also adds policy, training, reporting, contractor, research, and grant requirements, while phasing out the lower tipped minimum wage. Some of its biggest effects would depend on future agency rules and enforcement.

Where it stands

Sitting in Education and Workforce

No vote scheduled. Constituent contact is what moves bills out of committee.

What this bill actually does
  • Requires employers with 15 or more employees to adopt, hand out, and post a full written nondiscrimination and anti-harassment policy within 1 year after enactment. Fines can reach $1,000 per violation and at least $5,000 for repeated or willful violations.
  • Tells the EEOC to issue rules requiring interactive anti-discrimination and anti-harassment training for employees, plus specialized training for supervisors, based on research about what training works best.
  • Requires the EEOC to create model policies and trainings in multiple languages and accessible formats, specifically for employers with fewer than 15 employees.

↓ Why your message matters here

This bill is sitting in committee with no scheduled vote — which means a small number of constituent messages can decide whether it moves forward or quietly dies.

Where do you stand?

Pick a stance and we'll draft a message to your representative in plain English.

The debate

What people are saying about this bill

Arguments in support
  • Empowers Victims: By lowering the proof standard, it becomes easier for victims of discrimination to win their cases.
  • More Time for Justice: Extending the filing deadline gives victims more time to come forward without fear of missing their chance.
  • Prevents Secret Settlements: Limiting forced arbitration means more cases can be heard in public court, promoting transparency.
Arguments against
  • Increased Litigation Costs: Businesses might face higher legal fees, which could lead to increased prices for consumers.
  • Slower Dispute Resolution: Banning arbitration could slow down the resolution of disputes, which are often quicker and cheaper than court cases.
  • Risk of Frivolous Claims: Lowering the proof standard might lead to an increase in weak or unfounded lawsuits.

Where this bill is in the process

Legislative timeline

Introduced

Introduced in House

House Committee

Under House committee consideration

Latest: Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committees on the Judiciary, House Administration, Oversight and Government Reform, and Veterans' Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. (2/13/2026)

FEB 13

House Floor Vote

Voted on by House

Passed House

Approved by House

Senate Review

Sent to Senate for consideration

Passed Both Chambers

Approved by both House and Senate

Signed into Law

Signed by the President

For more detail

Read deeper