ModernAction Logo
·Part of upcoming_floor_vote
HR6409 · 119th Congress
House Floor·Last action 2 days ago

States could avoid some air penalties for pollution they did not cause

Officially: FENCES Act

States could avoid some federal air penalties when pollution mostly comes from outside their control. The bill also blocks some out-of-compliance labels for new or updated standards if foreign pollution is the real reason. States still have to keep working to meet federal air rules.

Where it stands

Environment · Hearing Tue, Apr 14

In 3 days. Members are taking positions right now.

What this bill actually does
  • Foreign pollution would count under this Clean Air Act rule whether it comes from people or from natural causes. The bill makes that explicit.
  • EPA could not label an area out of compliance with a new or updated air standard if the state proves foreign pollution is the only reason it misses the mark. That includes both natural and human-caused pollution from outside the country.
  • A state would have to prove its case to EPA. The EPA Administrator must be satisfied with that showing.

↓ Why your message matters here

Members are still deciding how to vote — and what they hear from constituents in these final days is what tips undecided ones.

Where do you stand?

Pick a stance and we'll draft a message to your representative in plain English.

The debate

What people are saying about this bill

Arguments in support
  • Stops states and local areas from being punished for pollution they did not cause and cannot control. That includes foreign pollution and some natural events.
  • Makes air quality labels more accurate by separating homegrown pollution from pollution that drifts in or comes from unusual events.
  • Could lower costs for communities and businesses when outside pollution is the main reason an area has high readings. That may reduce the hit from federal sanctions and fees.
Arguments against
  • Could make air rules harder to enforce if states use foreign pollution or exceptional-event claims to avoid sanctions and fees.
  • Could weaken pressure to adopt stronger local pollution controls. Some areas may blame more of their problem on outside sources instead.
  • Could lead to fights over where the pollution really came from. Those disputes may slow decisions and delay action.

Where this bill is in the process

Legislative timeline

Introduced

Introduced in House

House Committee

Under House committee consideration

House Floor Vote

Voted on by House

Latest: Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 514. (4/9/2026)

APR 9

Passed House

Approved by House

Senate Review

Sent to Senate for consideration

Passed Both Chambers

Approved by both House and Senate

Signed into Law

Signed by the President

For more detail

Read deeper