Modern Action logo
IssuesBillsBriefing
Donate
Donate
Modern Action

Navigation

Menu

01HomeFront page→02IssuesActive issue pages→03BillsLegislation index→04BriefingDaily context→05DonateSupport the work→

Account

Sign In→Get Started→
Modern Action

Find the bills behind the news, understand what Congress can do, and contact your representatives with a specific message.

Platform

  • Contact Congress
  • Write to Congress
  • Browse Bills
  • Track Bills

Resources

  • Find My Representatives
  • Contact My Representatives
  • How to Contact Representatives
  • Does Contacting Congress Work?

Support

  • Contact Us
  • Accessibility

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookie Policy
  • Accessibility

Stay informed about legislation

Get weekly updates on important bills and how to take action.

© 2026 Modern Action. All rights reserved.

Made with ❤️ for democracy
All systems operational
Bills911 Community Crisis Responders Act of 2025
In House Committee

911 Community Crisis Responders Act of 2025

H.R. 3658 – 911 Community Crisis Responders Act of 2025 to fund unarmed mobile crisis teams for certain 911 calls

119th Congress

H.R. 3658 would let the federal government give grants to states, localities, and Tribes to run unarmed mobile crisis response programs for some nonviolent 911 calls. These teams would send trained health and social service workers instead of law enforcement in specific situations. The bill also requires regular reporting to track results and share information with Congress.

Bill Number
HR3658
Chamber
house
Take action on this bill

What This Bill Does

The bill creates a federal grant program run by the Department of Health and Human Services, through the Assistant Secretary for Mental Health and Substance Use. States, territories, cities, counties, Tribal governments, and Tribal consortia could apply for funds to start or expand unarmed mobile crisis response programs. These programs would handle certain nonviolent 911 calls by sending unarmed professional service providers instead of law enforcement. To qualify, a program must send out teams of at least two unarmed providers and be able to screen and assess people, calm tense situations, give trauma‑informed and culturally competent help, connect people to local services, and transport people to needed treatment. Programs must be independent of police oversight and must clearly define which types of calls will go to the mobile crisis teams first. They must also be able to coordinate with health, housing, and social service agencies. Grant money may be used to hire unarmed crisis workers and 911 public safety telecommunicators, and to train both groups. Training must cover how to identify and respond to mental illness, physical and developmental disabilities, and substance use disorders, using tools like de‑escalation and crisis intervention. Funds can also update 911 systems so call‑takers can sort nonviolent calls from those that need law enforcement, develop and deliver training curricula for telecommunicators, coordinate with 988 crisis centers for dispatch, expand multilingual and culturally competent services, and collect data for reports. Grant applicants must submit a plan, including how they will train 911 call‑takers to decide when to send an unarmed crisis team. Grantees must send reports to the Secretary of Health and Human Services every two years, with details on the number and types of diverted calls, who was served, impacts on emergency rooms, hospitalizations, ambulance use, and law enforcement involvement, and information about response times, time spent on scene, outcomes such as transfers to alternative destinations, and program costs. The Secretary must then provide a summary report to Congress every two years. The bill also allows partial grants to programs that do not yet meet all program standards and includes a nondiscrimination rule for all programs funded under this section.

Why It Matters

The bill addresses how communities respond to certain nonviolent emergencies, such as mental health crises, homelessness, addiction problems, and some public behavior issues. In many places today, police are the main responders even when situations are health‑ or social‑service‑related. This bill encourages another option by funding teams made up of nurses, social workers, counselors, and similar professionals who are trained for these types of crises and do not carry firearms. For people in crisis, this could change who shows up when someone calls 911 and what kind of help they receive. It may also affect how often emergency rooms, ambulances, and jails are used in these situations, but the exact impact would depend on how each community designs and runs its program. The required data collection and reports to Congress aim to show how these programs work in practice, including costs, response times, and outcomes for people served, so future policy choices can be based on evidence. The nondiscrimination requirement means programs must be open and fair to people of different races, genders, sexual orientations, gender identities, disabilities, and other traits. This may matter for communities that have concerns about unequal treatment in emergency responses, though the bill does not itself change other existing civil rights laws or enforcement systems.

External Categories and Tags

Categories

healthcarecivil-rights

Tags

mental-health-crisis (100%)mobile-crisis-teams (90%)911-system (80%)grant-program (70%)substance-use-disorders (60%)training-requirements (50%)data-reporting (40%)non-discrimination (30%)tribal-governments (25%)community-services (20%)

Arguments

Arguments in support

  • May give people facing mental health, substance use, or homelessness crises access to responders with specialized training instead of or in addition to law enforcement.
  • Could reduce strain on emergency rooms, ambulances, and police resources if nonviolent calls are diverted to health‑focused crisis teams.
  • Standardized training and clear call‑triage rules may improve safety and consistency in how nonviolent 911 calls are handled.
  • Data and reporting requirements can help policymakers understand costs, response times, and outcomes, supporting evidence‑based decisions about emergency response models.
  • The nondiscrimination clause and focus on culturally competent and multilingual services may improve access and trust in crisis services for diverse communities.
  • Allowing partial grants to programs that do not yet meet all requirements may help smaller or under‑resourced communities build capacity over time.

Arguments against

  • Diverting certain 911 calls away from law enforcement might raise concerns about responder and public safety in situations that may appear nonviolent at first but could become risky.
  • Setting up and maintaining separate mobile crisis teams and upgraded 911 systems may be costly for some jurisdictions, even with federal grants, and long‑term funding beyond grants is not addressed.
  • The requirement that programs not be under law enforcement oversight may complicate coordination between crisis teams and police in mixed or changing situations.
  • Collecting detailed demographic and crisis‑related data could raise privacy concerns for individuals who use these services.
  • Some may prefer to strengthen existing law enforcement crisis intervention training instead of creating a separate unarmed response system.
  • The bill does not specify total funding levels or duration of the grant program in the provided text, leaving uncertainty about its scale and sustainability.

Key Facts

  • Creates a new section (section 554) in the Public Health Service Act authorizing federal grants for unarmed mobile crisis response programs.
  • Limits eligible uses of funds to activities such as hiring and training unarmed crisis workers and 911 telecommunicators, updating 911 systems for call triage, building coordination with health and social services, and collecting program data.
  • Requires funded programs to dispatch teams of at least two unarmed professional service providers, able to provide screening, assessment, de‑escalation, trauma‑informed and culturally competent services, referrals, and transportation to needed treatment.
  • Prohibits these crisis response programs from being under the oversight of state, Tribal, or local law enforcement agencies.
  • Requires programs to clearly define which 911 calls must or may be referred to the unarmed crisis teams as first responders, focusing on nonviolent emergency calls.
  • Defines “nonviolent emergency calls” to include issues like mental health, homelessness, addiction problems, social services, truancy, intellectual and developmental disabilities, and public intoxication, when there is no obvious violent behavior.
  • Mandates that grantees submit detailed reports to the Secretary of Health and Human Services every two years, including demographics of individuals served, impacts on emergency and law enforcement use, response metrics, and cost analyses.
  • Directs the Secretary to provide a biannual summary report to Congress about the grant program and grantee outcomes.
  • Permits the Secretary to award reduced grant amounts to applicants that have not yet met all program criteria, allowing for phased development.
  • Includes a nondiscrimination provision covering all programs or activities funded under this grant authority, based on characteristics including race, color, religion, national origin, sex (including sexual orientation and gender identity), and disability.

Gotchas

  • The definition of “alternative destination” excludes hospital emergency departments and jails, steering programs toward community‑based sites like clinics, crisis homes, respite homes, and stabilization centers.
  • Demographic reporting must be highly detailed, including race, ethnicity, age, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, disability status, substance use disorder status, and housing status, which may require complex data systems and safeguards.
  • Coordination with 988 crisis centers is an allowed use of funds, tying this 911‑focused program into the newer national suicide and crisis lifeline system.
  • Programs cannot be overseen by law enforcement agencies, but they can still coordinate with them operationally, which may require careful local agreements that are not spelled out in the bill.
  • The Secretary has discretion to decide what information is required in grant applications and how “timely” dispatch and other program standards are interpreted, which could lead to variation in how the law is applied across jurisdictions.

Full Bill Text

We're fetching the official bill text from Congress.gov. Check back shortly.