ModernAction Logo
H.R.2444 · 119th Congress
Senate Floor·Last action 351 days ago

Creates a Commerce-led program to map “critical” supply chains and issue annual resilience strategies

Officially: Promoting Resilient Supply Chains Act of 2025

The Department of Commerce would run a new program to identify critical industries and goods, model their supply chains, and publish regular strategies and reports. Companies could share sensitive supply-chain data voluntarily, with strong limits on disclosure and use. The program would run on existing funding and end after 10 years.

Where it stands

floor_pending

Your representatives are deciding where they stand. A few messages can tip the balance.

What this bill actually does
  • Gives the Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Analysis a new, formal job: building resilience in critical supply chains and in emerging technologies (like advanced tech sectors).
  • Creates a federal Supply Chain Resilience Working Group that brings together at least ten specific departments and agencies so they coordinate their supply-chain work.
  • Requires the Assistant Secretary, within 120 days, to publish a list of what counts as critical industries, critical supply chains, and critical goods, take public comments, and refresh the list at least every 4 years.

↓ Why your message matters here

This bill is moving through Congress right now — your representative needs to hear from you.

Where do you stand?

Pick a stance and we'll draft a message to your representative in plain English.

The debate

What people are saying about this bill

Arguments in support
  • Enhances national security: Reduces reliance on countries like China for critical goods, making the U.S. less vulnerable to geopolitical tensions.
  • Prevents future disruptions: Creates an early warning system to predict and prevent shortages of important items like semiconductors and medical supplies.
  • Lowers costs for consumers: More efficient supply chains can lead to cheaper groceries, medicines, and other goods.
Arguments against
  • Lacks dedicated funding: Without new money, the bill's goals might not be fully realized, relying on existing budgets.
  • Risks bureaucratic gridlock: Complex interagency cooperation could lead to slow responses and overlapping mandates.
  • Challenges in reshoring: Bringing manufacturing back to the U.S. requires skilled labor and infrastructure, which could delay benefits.

Where this bill is in the process

Legislative timeline

Introduced

Introduced in House

House Committee

Under House committee consideration

House Floor Vote

Voted on by House

Passed House

Approved by House

Senate Review

Sent to Senate for consideration

Latest: Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 62. (4/29/2025)

APR 29

Passed Both Chambers

Approved by both House and Senate

Signed into Law

Signed by the President

For more detail

Read deeper