Federal programs including the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund, Emerging Contaminants grants for small or disadvantaged communities, and WIFIA loans provide money to help water systems install PFAS treatment. Technical assistance programs like PFAS OUT and WaterTA help systems navigate options. Disputes center on funding levels, eligibility rules, and whether support reaches small and rural systems facing the biggest cost burdens.
Answer what matters
Skip any question. Your message only uses the topics and provisions you answer.
Related legislation
4 related bills are tracked for context, but none have a time-sensitive action window right now.
Track what happens
After sending, you can choose updates as votes, cosponsorships, and related bills move.
Official status
Enter your ZIP to see recorded votes, cosponsorships, and petition signatures tied to this subject.
Tell us where you stand
Answer the policy questions below or skip any that do not fit your view. We'll map only your answers to the bills in Congress and draft your message.
2 bills on this topic
“The federal government should help rural people with limited money test and treat unsafe drinking water at home or in small local facilities.”
1 bill on this topic
“The federal government should help communities build safe drinking water and wastewater systems, while deciding when projects must use U.S.-made materials.”
1 bill on this topic
“Water ratepayers should be protected from surprise cost increases caused by Superfund lawsuits over contamination their utilities didn't cause.”
Optional, but recommended. Your selections come from relevant bills in Congress; if something is missing or you want a specific point included, add it here.
Example: My daughter's school closed twice last fall because of wildfire smoke.
Step 2 of 3 · Add your info next
Your message will cover 4 bills in Congress
A Yale field experiment found legislators shown actual district opinion shifted their votes to match it. The ones kept in the dark? No relationship between constituent views and how they voted.
Offices log, sort, tag, and tally incoming contact, then brief the member. Constituent communications eat roughly a third of House staff resources. Your message gets counted.
92% of staff say individualized messages influence undecided lawmakers — versus 56% for form letters. Naming a specific bill with your own reasoning puts you in a different category entirely.
When offices don’t hear from constituents, they ask lobbyists instead. Not contacting your rep doesn’t leave the scale empty — it hands the weight to someone else.
These are related bills tracked for context. None have a time-sensitive action window on this subject right now.
