Legislative proposals to require a court order before the FBI can access results from queries involving U.S. persons.
Tell us where you stand
Answer the policy questions below. We'll map your positions to the bills in Congress and draft your message.
2 bills on this topic
“Secret surveillance courts should hear independent views and share more legal information when it can be done without exposing real security risks.”
2 bills on this topic
“The government should not buy or force access to sensitive personal data as a way around the privacy rules that would apply to phone, email, or location records.”
1 bill on this topic
“Secret surveillance courts should have stronger outside checks and should share more information with Congress and the public when it can be done safely.”
1 bill on this topic
“The government should keep foreign surveillance powers only if there are strong rules for searches involving people in the United States.”
Optional, but recommended. Messages sound more real when they include one specific reason from your life.
Example: My daughter's school closed twice last fall because of wildfire smoke.
Step 2 of 3 · Add your info next
Your message will cover 3 bills in Congress
A Yale field experiment found legislators shown actual district opinion shifted their votes to match it. The ones kept in the dark? No relationship between constituent views and how they voted.
Offices log, sort, tag, and tally incoming contact, then brief the member. Constituent communications eat roughly a third of House staff resources. Your message gets counted.
92% of staff say individualized messages influence undecided lawmakers — versus 56% for form letters. Naming a specific bill with your own reasoning puts you in a different category entirely.
When offices don’t hear from constituents, they ask lobbyists instead. Not contacting your rep doesn’t leave the scale empty — it hands the weight to someone else.
